From f54df2f626930486b696a8e32465c7ed79391e12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sanjoy Das Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 20:28:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [SROA] Add support for non-integral pointers Summary: C.f. http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#non-integral-pointer-type Reviewers: chandlerc, loladiro Reviewed By: loladiro Subscribers: reames, loladiro, mcrosier, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32203 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@305639 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Transforms/Scalar/SROA.cpp | 13 +++++- test/Transforms/SROA/non-integral-pointers.ll | 46 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 test/Transforms/SROA/non-integral-pointers.ll diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SROA.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SROA.cpp index 1527f15f18a..f32d2d58229 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SROA.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SROA.cpp @@ -1637,8 +1637,17 @@ static bool canConvertValue(const DataLayout &DL, Type *OldTy, Type *NewTy) { return cast(NewTy)->getPointerAddressSpace() == cast(OldTy)->getPointerAddressSpace(); } - if (NewTy->isIntegerTy() || OldTy->isIntegerTy()) - return true; + + // We can convert integers to integral pointers, but not to non-integral + // pointers. + if (OldTy->isIntegerTy()) + return !DL.isNonIntegralPointerType(NewTy); + + // We can convert integral pointers to integers, but non-integral pointers + // need to remain pointers. + if (!DL.isNonIntegralPointerType(OldTy)) + return NewTy->isIntegerTy(); + return false; } diff --git a/test/Transforms/SROA/non-integral-pointers.ll b/test/Transforms/SROA/non-integral-pointers.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..63286309f6f --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Transforms/SROA/non-integral-pointers.ll @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +; RUN: opt -sroa -S < %s | FileCheck %s + +; This test checks that SROA does not introduce ptrtoint and inttoptr +; casts from and to non-integral pointers. The "ni:4" bit in the +; datalayout states that pointers of address space 4 are to be +; considered "non-integral". + +target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128-ni:4" +target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" + +define void @f0(i1 %alwaysFalse, i64 %val) { +; CHECK-LABEL: @f0( +; CHECK-NOT: inttoptr +; CHECK-NOT: ptrtoint +entry: + %loc = alloca i64 + store i64 %val, i64* %loc + br i1 %alwaysFalse, label %neverTaken, label %alwaysTaken + +neverTaken: + %loc.bc = bitcast i64* %loc to i8 addrspace(4)** + %ptr = load i8 addrspace(4)*, i8 addrspace(4)** %loc.bc + store i8 5, i8 addrspace(4)* %ptr + ret void + +alwaysTaken: + ret void +} + +define i64 @f1(i1 %alwaysFalse, i8 addrspace(4)* %val) { +; CHECK-LABEL: @f1( +; CHECK-NOT: inttoptr +; CHECK-NOT: ptrtoint +entry: + %loc = alloca i8 addrspace(4)* + store i8 addrspace(4)* %val, i8 addrspace(4)** %loc + br i1 %alwaysFalse, label %neverTaken, label %alwaysTaken + +neverTaken: + %loc.bc = bitcast i8 addrspace(4)** %loc to i64* + %int = load i64, i64* %loc.bc + ret i64 %int + +alwaysTaken: + ret i64 42 +} -- 2.40.0