From f37312023650c72a66ec372abf29b52171479fe9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Rekorajski <baggins@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 19:15:16 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Relevant BUGIDs: 530428

Purpose of commit: bugfix

Commit summary:
---------------
pam_limits didn't the priority value specified in config.
---
 modules/pam_limits/pam_limits.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/modules/pam_limits/pam_limits.c b/modules/pam_limits/pam_limits.c
index f85c5f05..dde96701 100644
--- a/modules/pam_limits/pam_limits.c
+++ b/modules/pam_limits/pam_limits.c
@@ -419,7 +419,9 @@ static void process_limit(int source, const char *lim_type,
     } else {
 	/* recent kernels support negative priority limits (=raise priority) */
 
-	if (limit_item != LIMIT_PRI) {
+	if (limit_item == LIMIT_PRI) {
+		pl->priority = limit_value;
+	} else {
 	        if (pl->login_limit_def < source) {
 	            return;
 	        } else {
-- 
2.40.0