From f2daf531762bb788d7ad5c1ecc5d004d3dd48da1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Smith Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 20:31:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] In the presence of modules, we can have multiple implicit instantiations of the same template. Teach RecursiveASTVisitor to visit all of those, not just one of them. This is difficult to test by itself, but will be covered by an upcoming change. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@204175 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- include/clang/AST/DataRecursiveASTVisitor.h | 100 +++++++++-------- include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h | 114 ++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/clang/AST/DataRecursiveASTVisitor.h b/include/clang/AST/DataRecursiveASTVisitor.h index 57f4043389..5afa9cd679 100644 --- a/include/clang/AST/DataRecursiveASTVisitor.h +++ b/include/clang/AST/DataRecursiveASTVisitor.h @@ -1407,20 +1407,27 @@ template bool DataRecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseClassInstantiations( ClassTemplateDecl *D) { for (auto *SD : D->specializations()) { - switch (SD->getSpecializationKind()) { - // Visit the implicit instantiations with the requested pattern. - case TSK_Undeclared: - case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation: - TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(SD)); - break; - - // We don't need to do anything on an explicit instantiation - // or explicit specialization because there will be an explicit - // node for it elsewhere. - case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration: - case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition: - case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization: - break; + for (auto *RD : SD->redecls()) { + // We don't want to visit injected-class-names in this traversal. + if (cast(RD)->isInjectedClassName()) + continue; + + switch (cast(RD)-> + getSpecializationKind()) { + // Visit the implicit instantiations with the requested pattern. + case TSK_Undeclared: + case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation: + TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(RD)); + break; + + // We don't need to do anything on an explicit instantiation + // or explicit specialization because there will be an explicit + // node for it elsewhere. + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration: + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition: + case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization: + break; + } } } @@ -1453,20 +1460,23 @@ template bool DataRecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseVariableInstantiations( VarTemplateDecl *D) { for (auto *SD : D->specializations()) { - switch (SD->getSpecializationKind()) { - // Visit the implicit instantiations with the requested pattern. - case TSK_Undeclared: - case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation: - TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(SD)); - break; - - // We don't need to do anything on an explicit instantiation - // or explicit specialization because there will be an explicit - // node for it elsewhere. - case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration: - case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition: - case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization: - break; + for (auto *RD : SD->redecls()) { + switch (cast(RD)-> + getSpecializationKind()) { + // Visit the implicit instantiations with the requested pattern. + case TSK_Undeclared: + case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation: + TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(RD)); + break; + + // We don't need to do anything on an explicit instantiation + // or explicit specialization because there will be an explicit + // node for it elsewhere. + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration: + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition: + case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization: + break; + } } } @@ -1501,21 +1511,25 @@ template bool DataRecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseFunctionInstantiations( FunctionTemplateDecl *D) { for (auto *FD : D->specializations()) { - switch (FD->getTemplateSpecializationKind()) { - case TSK_Undeclared: - case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation: - // We don't know what kind of FunctionDecl this is. - TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(FD)); - break; - - // No need to visit explicit instantiations, we'll find the node - // eventually. - case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration: - case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition: - break; - - case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization: - break; + for (auto *RD : FD->redecls()) { + switch (RD->getTemplateSpecializationKind()) { + case TSK_Undeclared: + case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation: + // We don't know what kind of FunctionDecl this is. + TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(RD)); + break; + + // No need to visit explicit instantiations, we'll find the node + // eventually. + // FIXME: This is incorrect; there is no other node for an explicit + // instantiation of a function template specialization. + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration: + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition: + break; + + case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization: + break; + } } } diff --git a/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h b/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h index 54412bf4bc..3226c3c32d 100644 --- a/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h +++ b/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h @@ -1488,35 +1488,59 @@ bool RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseTemplateParameterListHelper( return true; } -#define DEF_TRAVERSE_TMPL_INST(TMPLDECLKIND) \ -/* A helper method for traversing the implicit instantiations of a - class or variable template. */ \ -template \ -bool RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseTemplateInstantiations( \ - TMPLDECLKIND##TemplateDecl *D) { \ - for (auto *SD : D->specializations()) { \ - switch (SD->getSpecializationKind()) { \ - /* Visit the implicit instantiations with the requested pattern. */ \ - case TSK_Undeclared: \ - case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation: \ - TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(SD)); \ - break; \ - \ - /* We don't need to do anything on an explicit instantiation - or explicit specialization because there will be an explicit - node for it elsewhere. */ \ - case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration: \ - case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition: \ - case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization: \ - break; \ - } \ - } \ - \ - return true; \ +template +bool RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseTemplateInstantiations( + ClassTemplateDecl *D) { + for (auto *SD : D->specializations()) { + for (auto *RD : SD->redecls()) { + // We don't want to visit injected-class-names in this traversal. + if (cast(RD)->isInjectedClassName()) + continue; + + switch (cast(RD)-> + getSpecializationKind()) { + // Visit the implicit instantiations with the requested pattern. + case TSK_Undeclared: + case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation: + TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(RD)); + break; + + // We don't need to do anything on an explicit instantiation + // or explicit specialization because there will be an explicit + // node for it elsewhere. + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration: + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition: + case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization: + break; + } + } + } + + return true; +} + +template +bool RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseTemplateInstantiations( + VarTemplateDecl *D) { + for (auto *SD : D->specializations()) { + for (auto *RD : SD->redecls()) { + switch (cast(RD)-> + getSpecializationKind()) { + case TSK_Undeclared: + case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation: + TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(RD)); + break; + + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration: + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition: + case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization: + break; + } + } + } + + return true; } - -DEF_TRAVERSE_TMPL_INST(Class) -DEF_TRAVERSE_TMPL_INST(Var) // A helper method for traversing the instantiations of a // function while skipping its specializations. @@ -1524,22 +1548,24 @@ template bool RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseTemplateInstantiations( FunctionTemplateDecl *D) { for (auto *FD : D->specializations()) { - switch (FD->getTemplateSpecializationKind()) { - case TSK_Undeclared: - case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation: - // We don't know what kind of FunctionDecl this is. - TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(FD)); - break; - - // FIXME: For now traverse explicit instantiations here. Change that - // once they are represented as dedicated nodes in the AST. - case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration: - case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition: - TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(FD)); - break; - - case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization: - break; + for (auto *RD : FD->redecls()) { + switch (RD->getTemplateSpecializationKind()) { + case TSK_Undeclared: + case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation: + // We don't know what kind of FunctionDecl this is. + TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(RD)); + break; + + // FIXME: For now traverse explicit instantiations here. Change that + // once they are represented as dedicated nodes in the AST. + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration: + case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition: + TRY_TO(TraverseDecl(RD)); + break; + + case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization: + break; + } } } -- 2.40.0