From f13f112eb22acde2d895c06a4c0671de5ce9bddd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ken Coar Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:21:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Still bright and sunny git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@93155 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index cfa95dcadd..d6ba465067 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/01 13:16:00 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/01 13:21:34 $] Release: @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: Justin says: "Is this really a showstopper? Most people won't be using -DNO_DETACH and will look at the error logs anyway." + Ken says: "Yes, it's a showstopper -- because it exits with + a 0 status on startup failure, whether it spawns + or not, before doing any work. A script will + incorrectly think it successfully daemonised." Not a showstopper: trawick * ap_directory_walk skips some per-dir config merge functions @@ -110,6 +114,9 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: statically if you don't want to let libtool handle it. At most, I don't consider this a a release showstopper as it is a packaging issue." + Ken sez: "Showstopper because, until it's the default, it + violates the P of LA. Binaries will give strange + errors and not run if moved." Status: Aaron volunteers: I'll commit a patch to allow all the support binaries to be built statically against libapr/libaprutil/etc and then enable it in binbuild. @@ -135,7 +142,7 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: on dev@apr: Message-ID: <20020111115006.K1529@clove.org> Vote: Is a non-portable perchild going to hold up a GA release? - Yes: + Yes: Ken No: Aaron, Justin, trawick * Modify the worker MPM so that it doesn't need to create and -- 2.40.0