From e544d65aae974bc5d094c5d3224373f5a59b16f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Miss Islington (bot)" <31488909+miss-islington@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 05:08:43 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fix two typos in Objects/odictobject.c comments (GH-8040) (cherry picked from commit 6f19fc6d5607040ee36153a64a2ed004582af91f) Co-authored-by: Robert Krzyzanowski --- Objects/odictobject.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Objects/odictobject.c b/Objects/odictobject.c index 65f90e8343..26f1579441 100644 --- a/Objects/odictobject.c +++ b/Objects/odictobject.c @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Linked-List API As noted, the linked-list implemented here does not have all the bells and whistles. However, we recognize that the implementation may need to change to accommodate performance improvements or extra functionality. To -that end, We use a simple API to interact with the linked-list. Here's a +that end, we use a simple API to interact with the linked-list. Here's a summary of the methods/macros: Node info: @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ Potential Optimizations - Set node->key to NULL to indicate the node is not-in-use. - Add _odict_EXISTS()? - How to maintain consistency across resizes? Existing node pointers - would be invalidate after a resize, which is particularly problematic + would be invalidated after a resize, which is particularly problematic for the iterators. * Use a more stream-lined implementation of update() and, likely indirectly, __init__(). -- 2.40.0