From e2e95f5ef3c17197e319e4bbee70486f6a33e7d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 12:48:51 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix pg_dump's handling of public schema with both -c and -C options. Since -c plus -C requests dropping and recreating the target database as a whole, not dropping individual objects in it, we should assume that the public schema already exists and need not be created. The previous coding considered only the state of the -c option, so it would emit "CREATE SCHEMA public" anyway, leading to an unexpected error in restore. Back-patch to 9.2. Older versions did not accept -c with -C so the issue doesn't arise there. (The logic being patched here dates to 8.0, cf commit 2193121fa, so it's not really wrong that it didn't consider the case at the time.) Note that versions before 9.6 will still attempt to emit REVOKE/GRANT on the public schema; but that happens without -c/-C too, and doesn't seem to be the focus of this complaint. I considered extending this stanza to also skip the public schema's ACL, but that would be a misfeature, as it'd break cases where users intentionally changed that ACL. The real fix for this aspect is Stephen Frost's work to not dump built-in ACLs, and that's not going to get back-ported. Per bugs #13804 and #14271. Solution found by David Johnston and later rediscovered by me. Report: <20151207163520.2628.95990@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Report: <20160801021955.1430.47434@wrigleys.postgresql.org> --- src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c index 796a0aa716..17a3050c30 100644 --- a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c +++ b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c @@ -3268,15 +3268,22 @@ _printTocEntry(ArchiveHandle *AH, TocEntry *te, bool isData, bool acl_pass) /* * Avoid dumping the public schema, as it will already be created ... - * unless we are using --clean mode, in which case it's been deleted and - * we'd better recreate it. Likewise for its comment, if any. + * unless we are using --clean mode (and *not* --create mode), in which + * case we've previously issued a DROP for it so we'd better recreate it. + * + * Likewise for its comment, if any. (We could try issuing the COMMENT + * command anyway; but it'd fail if the restore is done as non-super-user, + * so let's not.) + * + * XXX it looks pretty ugly to hard-wire the public schema like this, but + * it sits in a sort of no-mans-land between being a system object and a + * user object, so it really is special in a way. */ - if (!ropt->dropSchema) + if (!(ropt->dropSchema && !ropt->createDB)) { if (strcmp(te->desc, "SCHEMA") == 0 && strcmp(te->tag, "public") == 0) return; - /* The comment restore would require super-user privs, so avoid it. */ if (strcmp(te->desc, "COMMENT") == 0 && strcmp(te->tag, "SCHEMA public") == 0) return; -- 2.40.0