From e11afd7c5e57ee19c6def9c2251fb0b6dd804245 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Justin Erenkrantz Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 22:34:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] This issue is completed. git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@93323 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 17 +---------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index f2ddcee8d8..2a6596ab1c 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/06 22:32:34 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/06 22:34:47 $] Release: @@ -492,21 +492,6 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: useful as a perl dbm management example? If we keep it, do we address the issue above? - * use apu_dbm in mod_auth_dbm - Status: Greg +1 (low-priority volunteer) - Justin says: "Seems like this is already there, so should we just - remove the other DBM code in that file? If you want - to use gdbm, or dbm, etc, you should tell apr-util." - Will says: "bs - I may choose the fastest - most efficient native - dbm implementation, for shared proc caches, ssl session - caching, etc, but that has nothing to do with maintaining - a userlist via dbm, which has to remain readable between - builds/machines, etc. The use-multiple database schema - for apr-util would let us do this with just apr, though." - Ian says: "multi-dbm is in, but it still has ndbm support hardcoded - is this still required? isn't ndbm supported via gdbm?" - - * Integrate mod_dav. Some additional items remaining: - case_preserved_filename stuff -- 2.40.0