From d28f30ef4e69d6217f20b758a1e2a14a1c7f3b98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Kovalev Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 18:51:01 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Replacing (raster_block >> tx_size) with (block >> (tx_size << 1)). The new expression is much more logical than previous one. Surprisingly both expressions give exactly the same set of dependent values -- have_top, have_left, have_right -- in vp9_predict_intra_block. Change-Id: I63eb1b592b8c37883b3a0dbb1f3daa271e446109 --- vp9/decoder/vp9_decodframe.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/vp9/decoder/vp9_decodframe.c b/vp9/decoder/vp9_decodframe.c index 4746a3abd..86fba0541 100644 --- a/vp9/decoder/vp9_decodframe.c +++ b/vp9/decoder/vp9_decodframe.c @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static void predict_and_reconstruct_intra_block(int plane, int block, if (xd->mb_to_right_edge < 0 || xd->mb_to_bottom_edge < 0) extend_for_intra(xd, plane_bsize, plane, block, tx_size); - vp9_predict_intra_block(xd, raster_block >> tx_size, + vp9_predict_intra_block(xd, block >> (tx_size << 1), b_width_log2(plane_bsize), tx_size, mode, dst, pd->dst.stride, dst, pd->dst.stride); -- 2.40.0