From b6e8a86b1c8c1718a29c1e4e02380b83ee4bc7c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 18:56:15 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] In the comparison, both clang and GCC are popular and widely
 adopted.  This is no longer a win of GCC.

This whole doc should really be looked at.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179040 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 www/comparison.html | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html
index e8b14923b6..afc321e061 100644
--- a/www/comparison.html
+++ b/www/comparison.html
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
     <li>GCC supports languages that clang does not aim to, such as Java, Ada,
         FORTRAN, etc.</li>
     <li>GCC supports more targets than LLVM.</li>
-    <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>
     </ul>
     
     <p>Pro's of clang vs GCC:</p>
-- 
2.50.1