From b58c433ef90be2f9752cd54561c07dae87e3819c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andres Freund Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 17:03:04 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix duplicated words in comment. Reported-By: Peter Geoghegan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzn3rY2N0gTWndaApD113T+O8L6oz8cm7_F3P8y4awdoOg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: no, only present in master --- src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c b/src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c index 5f62cd5962..96feacc257 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c @@ -2102,9 +2102,9 @@ tuplesort_gettuple_common(Tuplesortstate *state, bool forward, * NULL value in leading attribute will set abbreviated value to zeroed * representation, which caller may rely on in abbreviated inequality check. * - * If copy is true, the slot receives a copied tuple that'll that will stay - * valid regardless of future manipulations of the tuplesort's state. Memory - * is owned by the caller. If copy is false, the slot will just receive a + * If copy is true, the slot receives a copied tuple that will stay valid + * regardless of future manipulations of the tuplesort's state. Memory is + * owned by the caller. If copy is false, the slot will just receive a * pointer to a tuple held within the tuplesort, which is more efficient, but * only safe for callers that are prepared to have any subsequent manipulation * of the tuplesort's state invalidate slot contents. -- 2.40.0