From b1298b03dbf964ae8e566010fef927d147e2512a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Akira Hatanaka Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 02:41:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [AttrDocs] Insert blank lines before and after code-block directives. The code snippets were not being displayed. This commit fixes the bug. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@252849 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td b/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td index f9d962fbde..b28ef6df0e 100644 --- a/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td +++ b/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td @@ -1627,7 +1627,9 @@ def NotTailCalledDocs : Documentation { The ``not_tail_called`` attribute prevents tail-call optimization on statically bound calls. It has no effect on indirect calls. Virtual functions, objective-c methods, and functions marked as ``always_inline`` cannot be marked as ``not_tail_called``. For example, it prevents tail-call optimization in the following case: + .. code-block: c + int __attribute__((not_tail_called)) foo1(int); int foo2(int a) { @@ -1635,7 +1637,9 @@ For example, it prevents tail-call optimization in the following case: } However, it doesn't prevent tail-call optimization in this case: + .. code-block: c + int __attribute__((not_tail_called)) foo1(int); int foo2(int a) { @@ -1647,7 +1651,9 @@ However, it doesn't prevent tail-call optimization in this case: } Marking virtual functions as ``not_tail_called`` is an error: + .. code-block: c++ + class Base { public: // not_tail_called on a virtual function is an error. -- 2.40.0