From a47460ac3473776e6060b689098e7ab6806d523d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Dickinson Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:26:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Merged revisions 75440 via svnmerge from svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk ........ r75440 | mark.dickinson | 2009-10-15 18:45:39 +0100 (Thu, 15 Oct 2009) | 1 line Allow core Python build to succeed under WITHOUT_COMPLEX. The module build stage still fails. ........ --- Python/compile.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Python/compile.c b/Python/compile.c index 264fdcdc5e..a3c79e891f 100644 --- a/Python/compile.c +++ b/Python/compile.c @@ -922,10 +922,8 @@ compiler_add_o(struct compiler *c, PyObject *dict, PyObject *o) { PyObject *t, *v; Py_ssize_t arg; - unsigned char *p, *q; - Py_complex z; + unsigned char *p; double d; - int real_part_zero, imag_part_zero; /* necessary to make sure types aren't coerced (e.g., int and long) */ /* _and_ to distinguish 0.0 from -0.0 e.g. on IEEE platforms */ @@ -940,7 +938,11 @@ compiler_add_o(struct compiler *c, PyObject *dict, PyObject *o) else t = PyTuple_Pack(2, o, o->ob_type); } +#ifndef WITHOUT_COMPLEX else if (PyComplex_Check(o)) { + Py_complex z; + int real_part_zero, imag_part_zero; + unsigned char *q; /* complex case is even messier: we need to make complex(x, 0.) different from complex(x, -0.) and complex(0., y) different from complex(-0., y), for any x and y. In @@ -970,6 +972,7 @@ compiler_add_o(struct compiler *c, PyObject *dict, PyObject *o) t = PyTuple_Pack(2, o, o->ob_type); } } +#endif /* WITHOUT_COMPLEX */ else { t = PyTuple_Pack(2, o, o->ob_type); } -- 2.50.1