From a2f886c665343992008dc8d7c270e7d4f157557e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Smith <ais523@nethack4.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 18:49:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Handle the case where we continue after locking a nonexistent
 file

The previous version of this would lead to big warnings and
impossibles. This doesn't seem like a useful case, but it's still
better to have better warning messages just in case it does
happen.
---
 src/files.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/src/files.c b/src/files.c
index 92bb10596..01ad0569f 100644
--- a/src/files.c
+++ b/src/files.c
@@ -1675,6 +1675,7 @@ int retryct;
     if (lockfd == -1) {
         HUP raw_printf("Cannot open file %s. Is NetHack installed correctly?",
                        filename);
+        nesting--;
         return FALSE;
     }
     sflock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
-- 
2.40.0