From a2ca4ae98b35d76b14cc936af1ebf13b93199d79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya Biryukov Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 08:40:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [Sema] Add implicit members even for invalid CXXRecordDecls Summary: It should be safe, since other code paths are already generating implicit members even in invalid CXXRecordDecls (e.g. lookup). If we don't generate implicit members on CXXRecordDecl's completion, they will be generated by next lookup of constructors. This causes a crash when the following conditions are met: - a CXXRecordDecl is invalid, - it is provided via ExternalASTSource (e.g. from PCH), - it has inherited constructors (they create ShadowDecls), - lookup of its constructors was not run before ASTWriter serialized it. This may require the ShadowDecls created for inherited constructors to be removed from the class, but that's no longer possible since class is provided by ExternalASTSource. See provided lit test for an example. Reviewers: bkramer Reviewed By: bkramer Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42810 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@324062 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | 6 +++--- test/Index/Inputs/crash-preamble-classes.h | 9 +++++++++ test/Index/crash-preamble-classes.cpp | 8 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 test/Index/Inputs/crash-preamble-classes.h create mode 100644 test/Index/crash-preamble-classes.cpp diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp index 526f6802c3..c3975f9f62 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp @@ -15440,10 +15440,10 @@ void Sema::ActOnFields(Scope *S, SourceLocation RecLoc, Decl *EnclosingDecl, CXXRecord->getDestructor()); } - if (!CXXRecord->isInvalidDecl()) { - // Add any implicitly-declared members to this class. - AddImplicitlyDeclaredMembersToClass(CXXRecord); + // Add any implicitly-declared members to this class. + AddImplicitlyDeclaredMembersToClass(CXXRecord); + if (!CXXRecord->isInvalidDecl()) { // If we have virtual base classes, we may end up finding multiple // final overriders for a given virtual function. Check for this // problem now. diff --git a/test/Index/Inputs/crash-preamble-classes.h b/test/Index/Inputs/crash-preamble-classes.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a8fb5cede0 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Index/Inputs/crash-preamble-classes.h @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +struct Incomplete; + +struct X : Incomplete { + X(); +}; + +struct Y : X { + using X::X; +}; diff --git a/test/Index/crash-preamble-classes.cpp b/test/Index/crash-preamble-classes.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e7d4bd70ae --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Index/crash-preamble-classes.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +#include "crash-preamble-classes.h" + +struct Z : Y { + Z() {} +}; + +// RUN: env CINDEXTEST_EDITING=1 \ +// RUN: c-index-test -test-load-source-reparse 5 local -I %S/Inputs %s -- 2.40.0