From 9e38d882b9bb3a63bd464ed2ea83a045d52a8db2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gisle Vanem Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:43:14 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix for bind() on Winsock; AF_UNSPEC (0) is illegal. Should we do this for all targets? --- lib/tftp.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/tftp.c b/lib/tftp.c index 4cdbdc22e..37e91b310 100644 --- a/lib/tftp.c +++ b/lib/tftp.c @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ #include "sendf.h" #include "tftp.h" #include "progress.h" +#include "connect.h" +#include "strerror.h" #define _MPRINTF_REPLACE /* use our functions only */ #include @@ -533,12 +535,18 @@ CURLcode Curl_tftp_connect(struct connectdata *conn, bool *done) state->sockfd = state->conn->sock[FIRSTSOCKET]; state->state = TFTP_STATE_START; +#ifdef WIN32 + /* AF_UNSPEC == 0 (from above calloc) doesn't work on Winsock */ + state->local_addr.sa_family = conn->ip_addr->ai_family; +#endif + tftp_set_timeouts(state); /* Bind to any interface, random UDP port */ rc = bind(state->sockfd, &state->local_addr, sizeof(state->local_addr)); if(rc) { - failf(conn->data, "failed to bind\n"); + failf(conn->data, "bind() failed; %s\n", + Curl_strerror(conn,Curl_ourerrno())); return CURLE_COULDNT_CONNECT; } -- 2.40.0