From 9dcf6d178a5119314b6bce604530072dc48022ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 14:19:54 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix documentation for pgbench tpcb-like.

We choose a random value for delta, not balance.  Back-patch to 9.6 where
the mistake arrived.

Author: Fabien Coelho
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.21.1904081752210.5867@lancre
---
 doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml
index 33e7b17c08..9a59ba3d43 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ pgbench <optional> <replaceable>options</> </optional> <replaceable>dbname</>
   <para>
    The default built-in transaction script (also invoked with <option>-b tpcb-like</>)
    issues seven commands per transaction over randomly chosen <literal>aid</>,
-   <literal>tid</>, <literal>bid</> and <literal>balance</>.
+   <literal>tid</>, <literal>bid</> and <literal>delta</>.
    The scenario is inspired by the TPC-B benchmark, but is not actually TPC-B,
    hence the name.
   </para>
-- 
2.40.0