From 8fa36ea24e097f98f8de2828dc44f092b05523d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Northover Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:11:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] XFAIL test that's inappropriate for AArch64 ABI Only some ABIs require the "signext" attribute on parameters. On most platforms, however, it's a useful test so it's best not to limit it to some random arbitrary platform. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@174619 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c b/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c index 27ae6a9b76..f548951435 100644 --- a/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c +++ b/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c @@ -1,6 +1,14 @@ // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -o - -emit-llvm | FileCheck %s +// XFAIL: aarch64 + // PR1513 +// AArch64 ABI actually requires the reverse of what this is testing: the callee +// does any extensions and remaining bits are unspecified. + +// Technically this test wasn't written to test that feature, but it's a +// valuable check nevertheless. + struct s{ long a; long b; -- 2.40.0