From 8ed68b36716ac6bbe3c15beecdf2d9524874b4e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Brawn Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:29:15 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [CGP] Fix handling of null pointer values in optimizeMemoryInst The current way that trivial addressing modes are detected incorrectly thinks that null pointers are non-trivial, leading to an infinite loop where we keep duplicating the same select. Fix this by aware of null when deciding if an addressing mode is trivial. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40447 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319019 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp | 16 +++--- .../CodeGenPrepare/ARM/sink-addrmode.ll | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp index 64c5db9b560..75f9f81c112 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp @@ -2080,16 +2080,14 @@ struct ExtAddrMode : public TargetLowering::AddrMode { return static_cast(Result); } - // AddrModes with a baseReg or gv where the reg/gv is - // the only populated field are trivial. + // An AddrMode is trivial if it involves no calculation i.e. it is just a base + // with no offset. bool isTrivial() { - if (BaseGV && !BaseOffs && !Scale && !BaseReg) - return true; - - if (!BaseGV && !BaseOffs && !Scale && BaseReg) - return true; - - return false; + // An AddrMode is (BaseGV + BaseReg + BaseOffs + ScaleReg * Scale) so it is + // trivial if at most one of these terms is nonzero, except that BaseGV and + // BaseReg both being zero actually means a null pointer value, which we + // consider to be 'non-zero' here. + return !BaseOffs && !Scale && !(BaseGV && BaseReg); } Value *GetFieldAsValue(FieldName Field, Type *IntPtrTy) { diff --git a/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/ARM/sink-addrmode.ll b/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/ARM/sink-addrmode.ll index 0be9c556f93..a26edb19da0 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/ARM/sink-addrmode.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/ARM/sink-addrmode.ll @@ -366,3 +366,55 @@ entey: store i32 %value, i32* %select, align 4 ret void } + +; Same for a select between a value and global variable +; CHECK-LABEL: @test_select_trivial_ptr_gv +; CHECK: select i1 %cmp, i32* %ptr, i32* @gv2 +define void @test_select_trivial_ptr_gv(i32* %ptr, i32 %value) { +entry: + %cmp = icmp sgt i32 %value, 0 + %select = select i1 %cmp, i32* %ptr, i32* @gv2 + store i32 %value, i32* %select, align 4 + ret void +} + +; Same for a select between a global variable and null, though the test needs to +; be a little more complicated to avoid dereferencing a potential null pointer +; CHECK-LABEL: @test_select_trivial_gv_null +; CHECK: select i1 %cmp.i, i32* @gv1, i32* null +define void @test_select_trivial_gv_null(){ +entry: + %gv1_val = load i32, i32* @gv1, align 4 + %cmp.i = icmp eq i32 %gv1_val, 0 + %spec.select.i = select i1 %cmp.i, i32* @gv1, i32* null + br i1 %cmp.i, label %if.then, label %if.end + +if.then: + %val = load i32, i32* %spec.select.i, align 4 + %inc = add nsw i32 %val, 1 + store i32 %inc, i32* %spec.select.i, align 4 + br label %if.end + +if.end: + ret void +} + +; Same for a select between a value and null +; CHECK-LABEL: @test_select_trivial_ptr_null +; CHECK: select i1 %cmp.i, i32* %ptr, i32* null +define void @test_select_trivial_ptr_null(i32* %ptr){ +entry: + %gv1_val = load i32, i32* %ptr, align 4 + %cmp.i = icmp eq i32 %gv1_val, 0 + %spec.select.i = select i1 %cmp.i, i32* %ptr, i32* null + br i1 %cmp.i, label %if.then, label %if.end + +if.then: + %val = load i32, i32* %spec.select.i, align 4 + %inc = add nsw i32 %val, 1 + store i32 %inc, i32* %spec.select.i, align 4 + br label %if.end + +if.end: + ret void +} -- 2.50.1