From 85c195fe828c8948862a08969cf10e48adf9daa2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: glennrp Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 22:14:30 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Expand entry about cheap transparency. --- ChangeLog | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 1bf5f2844..27836d04f 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ is, there is a single transparent color, no semitransparent colors, and no opaque color that has the same RGB components as the transparent color. If those aren't met, a color that is transparent in one pixel - and opaque in another would always be rendered as transparent (reference + and opaque in another would always be rendered as transparent, so we + must write a PNG colortype that has an alpha channel (reference http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=18167). 2011-02-22 6.6.7-9 Cristy -- 2.40.0