From 84b37c9c03a3c1cf204286ca303d48986cfc9cee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jim winstead Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 20:20:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] remove this, since it doesn't describe the current process, and is under a silly license. --- RELEASE_PROCESS | 186 ------------------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 186 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 RELEASE_PROCESS diff --git a/RELEASE_PROCESS b/RELEASE_PROCESS deleted file mode 100644 index 4e4d7f1936..0000000000 --- a/RELEASE_PROCESS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,186 +0,0 @@ - Advisory on the PHP Release Cycle - - -Copyright & Liciencing - - This Document is (c) Copyright 2000,2001 by The PHP Group - - This Document is distributed under the terms of the GNU General - Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; - either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later - version. - - -Table of Contents - - 1. Introduction - 2. Dealing with bugs - 2.1 As a QA Team Member - 2.2 As a Developer - 3. Releaseing another RC - 4. CVS During the Release Process - 4.1 Useful CVS Commands - 5 The Final Release - 6 Summary - - -1. Introduction - - This cycle should take place over roughly 10 days. When it is - decided it is time for an Release to occur Andi/Zeev (Or - Whoever) will tarball RC1, Tag & Branch CVS (see section 4) - and then announce the RC on PHP-QA and PHP-DEV. At this - point the build tracker and QA Bug System come into play. - If you successfully build PHP then report it in the build - tracker, If you then run and complete all the tests you - should report this too in the build tracker when - these features become avalible. - -2. Dealing with Bugs - -2.1 As a QA Team member - - If you find a bug in an RC that you think is a showstopper - then, even if it is a known bug, you should report it in the - QA Bug system. This marks the bug for discussion at least, - and preferably fixing before the actual release. This system - is separate from the main bugs system so that important bugs - dont get lost in the midst if lots of feature/change request - in the approach to a release. It is imperitive where - appropraite that as a QA'er a test script, Configure options - and PHP.ini files are provided to enable the developer to - reproduce the bug, this is an important part of our job. If - you have a serious bug then you should also create a test - script to be added to the tests dir of the php source so - that at the end of the process to enable us to make sure bug - does not return. It is not difficult to create these test - scripts and a readme on it can be found in - php4/tests/README. - - -2.2 As a Developer - - What should happen is that when a bug is reported it - is send to php-dev and php-qa as with other bugs. We should - have far stricter assignment system in this bug cycle rather - than just leaving them. Once again bugs should be able to be - marked as To Be Fixed Before release or moved to other bug - system. (This is currently the Release Masters responsibility) - - Then before the actual release the qa bugs system can be - checked and if there are outstanding To Be Fixed Before - release bugs the Developers can see this easyly rather than - show stoppers being dismissed and not worried about. - - When a bug is fixed the QAer who reported the bug is emailed - and asked to test again and see if the bug is fixed. - -3 Releasing another RC - - If it is felt necessary that a 2nd RC is needed then it - should be packaged as before and announced to both lists - again. The testing process then starts again, the RC2 is - added to the build tracker and QA'ers are asked to build and - retest the scripts as appropriate, espectially if you - reported a bug, you should test thourghly for your - bug and make sure it no longer occurs. This will normally - add anouther 3 days to the cycle, giving QA'ers time to - build test and report back, then for developers to - fix any problems. - -4 CVS during the release process - - At the point where the first RC is create a branch is - formed. This branch is not altered form that point onward - other than major bug fixes. Minor non important bug - fixes should not be applied to this branch but to the main - tree instead. Any major bug fixes should be applied to both - trees. The developer should test and check the RC tree then - also test and check the MAIN tree. This is their - responsibility to make sure (as far as possible) that the - bug fix works on both trees. - -4.1 Useful CVS Commands - - To create a Branch : - - $ cvs tag -b php_4_0_RC - IE: - $ cvs tag -b php_4_0_1RC1 - - This should be executed in the PHP directory of an up to - date checkout. Remember to also tag the Zend and TSRM repositories. - - You can retrieve a branch in one of two ways: by checking it - out fresh from the repository, or by switching an existing - working copy over to the branch, I would suggest you - checkout a new copy. - - To check out a new copy: - $ cvs checkout -r php_4_0_RC php4 - IE: - $ cvs checkout -r php_4_0_1RC1 php4 - - - To switch a working copy (Not recomended due to possible - commiting to wrong branch) - $ cvs update -r php_4_0_RC php4 - IE: - $ cvs update -r php_4_0_1RC1 php4 - - This should be done in the PHP4 directory itself. - - To revert back to normal branch you should use the - following: - $ cvs update -A - - To Commit to the branch you follow exactly the same - procedure as normal - $ cvs commit file.c - - MAKE SURE YOU DO NOT COMMIT TO THE WRONG BRANCH. - -5 The Final Release - - When it is time to make the final release the following - proceedure should be followed. The person who is tarballing - the final release should check the QA bugs system and make - sure there are no showstoppers left unfixed. If there are - then bug the person the bug is assigned to until they fix - it. If there are no more qa bugs then they should tag the - branch as php_4_0_ and tarball as usual. An email - should be sent to PHP-GEN, PHP_DEV and PHP-QA about the new - release and it should be added to php.net. The windows - binaries and servelets should be built as soon as possible - and added too, as should the windows installer. - -6 Summary - - Here is a summary of what a release cycle might look like: - - Thurs: RC is agreed on and packaged, an email is sent to - PHP_QA and PHP-DEV, the CVS is Branched and the - Release Cycle Begins. - - Mon: After a weekends testing most show stoppers should - have been found (Hopefully) and the developers get to - work on fixing them. - - Thurs: A second RC is released if needed with the new bug - fixes in and the QAers test again. - - Sun: A review is made of all outstanding bugs and any show - stoppers should be fixed. if there are no show - stoppers then the final release is packaged and - released on the monday morning on php.net - - Mon: Release is made. - - -James --- -James Moore -PHP QA Team -jmoore@php.net - -- 2.40.0