From 82be63fdcfdd5b6029cc7821bbb5e2eb8db45200 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tony Finch
The benefits of using the name-based virtual hosts is a practically -unlimited number of servers, ease of configuration and use, and +unlimited number of servers, ease of configuration and use, and it requires no additional hardware or software. The main disadvantage is that the client must support this part of the protocol. Almost all browsers do, but there are still tiny numbers of very old browsers in diff --git a/docs/manual/vhosts/name-based.html.en b/docs/manual/vhosts/name-based.html.en index 596e4cc277..1d834f2989 100644 --- a/docs/manual/vhosts/name-based.html.en +++ b/docs/manual/vhosts/name-based.html.en @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ what name it is being addressed as. Apache 1.1 and later support this approach as well as the old IP-address-per-hostname method.
The benefits of using the name-based virtual hosts is a practically -unlimited number of servers, ease of configuration and use, and +unlimited number of servers, ease of configuration and use, and it requires no additional hardware or software. The main disadvantage is that the client must support this part of the protocol. Almost all browsers do, but there are still tiny numbers of very old browsers in -- 2.50.1