From 7b3f0f8b8ac2278d29e39b685d7c84ccd6ce1e93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Haas Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 21:34:26 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix DetermineSafeOldestOffset for the case where there are no mxacts. Commit b69bf30b9bfacafc733a9ba77c9587cf54d06c0c failed to take into account the possibility that there might be no multixacts in existence at all. Report by Thomas Munro; patch by me. --- src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c index 031641e324..7ec7f525d1 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c @@ -2511,13 +2511,24 @@ DetermineSafeOldestOffset(MultiXactId oldestMXact) return; /* - * We determine the safe upper bound for offsets of new xacts by reading - * the offset of the oldest multixact, and going back one segment. This - * way, the sequence of multixact member segments will always have a - * one-segment hole at a minimum. We start spewing warnings a few - * complete segments before that. + * Determine the offset of the oldest multixact. Normally, we can read + * the offset from the multixact itself, but there's an important special + * case: if there are no multixacts in existence at all, oldestMXact + * obviously can't point to one. It will instead point to the multixact + * ID that will be assigned the next time one is needed. */ - oldestOffset = find_multixact_start(oldestMXact); + LWLockAcquire(MultiXactGenLock, LW_SHARED); + if (MultiXactState->nextMXact == oldestMXact) + { + oldestOffset = MultiXactState->nextOffset; + LWLockRelease(MultiXactGenLock); + } + else + { + LWLockRelease(MultiXactGenLock); + oldestOffset = find_multixact_start(oldestMXact); + } + /* move back to start of the corresponding segment */ oldestOffset -= oldestOffset % (MULTIXACT_MEMBERS_PER_PAGE * SLRU_PAGES_PER_SEGMENT); -- 2.40.0