From 7a9b46c6c7524cc381adbdeaac7f33c928239043 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Reid Kleckner Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:22:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix MSVCCompatibility doc ReST and wording. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@202732 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst b/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst index 346b860e76..879bb3de16 100644 --- a/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst +++ b/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ ABI features The status of major ABI-impacting C++ features: -* Record layout: :good:`Mostly complete`. We've attacked this with a fuzzer, - and most of the remaining failures involve ``#pragma pack``, +* Record layout: :good:`Mostly complete`. We've tested this with a fuzzer, and + most of the remaining failures involve ``#pragma pack``, ``__declspec(align(N))``, or other pragmas. * Class inheritance: :good:`Mostly complete`. This covers all of the standard @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ The status of major ABI-impacting C++ features: Template instantiation and name lookup ====================================== -In addition to the usual `dependent name lookup FAQs `_, Clang is often unable -to parse certain invalid C++ constructs that MSVC allows. As of this writing, +In addition to the usual `dependent name lookup FAQs`_, Clang is often unable to +parse certain invalid C++ constructs that MSVC allows. As of this writing, Clang will reject code with missing ``typename`` annotations: .. _dependent name lookup FAQs: -- 2.40.0