From 6f822952eea112d3e19a0ddaad32e99d1943f29d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alvaro Herrera Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:32:30 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Use newly added InvalidCommandId instead of 0 The symbol was added by 71901ab6d; the original code was introduced by 6868ed749. Development of both overlapped which is why we apparently failed to notice. This is a (very slight) behavior change, so I'm not backpatching this to 9.4 for now, even though the symbol does exist there. --- src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c index 9d2775bab1..5141fcab7a 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c @@ -2818,7 +2818,7 @@ l1: if (result == HeapTupleSelfUpdated) hufd->cmax = HeapTupleHeaderGetCmax(tp.t_data); else - hufd->cmax = 0; /* for lack of an InvalidCommandId value */ + hufd->cmax = InvalidCommandId; UnlockReleaseBuffer(buffer); if (have_tuple_lock) UnlockTupleTuplock(relation, &(tp.t_self), LockTupleExclusive); @@ -3415,7 +3415,7 @@ l2: if (result == HeapTupleSelfUpdated) hufd->cmax = HeapTupleHeaderGetCmax(oldtup.t_data); else - hufd->cmax = 0; /* for lack of an InvalidCommandId value */ + hufd->cmax = InvalidCommandId; UnlockReleaseBuffer(buffer); if (have_tuple_lock) UnlockTupleTuplock(relation, &(oldtup.t_self), *lockmode); @@ -4573,7 +4573,7 @@ failed: if (result == HeapTupleSelfUpdated) hufd->cmax = HeapTupleHeaderGetCmax(tuple->t_data); else - hufd->cmax = 0; /* for lack of an InvalidCommandId value */ + hufd->cmax = InvalidCommandId; LockBuffer(*buffer, BUFFER_LOCK_UNLOCK); if (have_tuple_lock) UnlockTupleTuplock(relation, tid, mode); -- 2.40.0