From 60356aa76de908a2a28014933de665c972487d3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruce Momjian Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 00:28:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] No need for TODO.detail error. --- doc/TODO.detail/error | 1365 ----------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 1365 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/TODO.detail/error diff --git a/doc/TODO.detail/error b/doc/TODO.detail/error deleted file mode 100644 index 7daf315463..0000000000 --- a/doc/TODO.detail/error +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1365 +0,0 @@ -From pgsql-hackers-owner+M16120=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org Fri Nov 30 12:14:19 2001 -Return-path: -Received: from rs.postgresql.org (server1.pgsql.org [64.39.15.238] (may be forged)) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id fAUIEIR21802 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:14:18 -0500 (EST) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by rs.postgresql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAUI6ER13094 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:11:00 -0600 (CST) - (envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M16120=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org) -Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.200]) - by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAUI58m98870 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:05:08 -0500 (EST) - (envelope-from peter_e@gmx.net) -Received: from [195.20.224.208] (helo=mrvdom01.schlund.de) - by moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) - id 169s27-00049P-00 - for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:05:07 +0100 -Received: from p3e9e6fa2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([62.158.111.162]) - by mrvdom01.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) - id 169s21-0001UP-00 - for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:05:03 +0100 -Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:12:16 +0100 (CET) -From: Peter Eisentraut -X-Sender: -To: PostgreSQL Development -Subject: [HACKERS] Backend error message style issues -Message-ID: -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: ORr - -Now that we've gone through nearly one development cycle with national -language support, I'd like to bring up a number of issues concerning the -style of the backend error messages that make life difficult, but probably -not only for the translators but for users as well. Not all of these are -strictly translation issues, but the message catalogs make for a good -overview of what's going on. - -I hope we can work through all of these during the next development -period. - -Prefixing messages with command names -------------------------------------- - -For instance, - -| CREATE DATABASE: permission denied - -This "command: message" style is typical for command-line programs and -it's pretty useful there if you run many commands in a pipe. The same -usefulness could probably be derived if you run many SQL commands in a -function. (Just "permission denied" would be very confusing there!) - -If we want to use that style we should make it consistent and we should -automate it. Via the "command tag" mechanism we already know what command -we're executing, so we can automatically prefix all messages that way. It -could even be switched off by the user if it's deemed annoying. - - -Prefixing messages with function names --------------------------------------- - -The function names obviously have no meaning to the user. It is claimed -that they allow a developer to locate the place the error was raised -faster, but that's only half the truth. Firstly, this whole thing doesn't -work if the displayed name of the function was actually passed in from -elsewhere. Then it takes you three times longer to locate the source -because you *think* you know where it was but it's not there. Secondly, -a developer doesn't have the need to locate every error. For instance, - -| ExecAppend: rejected due to CHECK constraint foo - -There's no need to debug anything there, it's a perfectly normal use -situation. - -I think the key here is to distinguish error messages that are perfectly -normal user-level events from messages which really represent an "assert -failure, but continue gracefully", such as - -| initGISTstate: numberOfAttributes %d > %d - -The latter could better be written something like - -| BETTER_BE_TRUE(index->rd_att->natts > INDEX_MAX_KEYS); - -we could lead to an error message in the style of an assert failure, -including the expression in question and file and line information (and -bug reporting suggestions). This way the developer doesn't have to write -any message text at all but still gets much better information to locate -the source. (E.g., note that the tested variable isn't even called -"numberOfAttributes".) - -The exact API could be tuned to include some other information such as an -informal message, but I think something along these lines needs to be -worked out. - - -Quoting -------- - -Which is better: - -function '%s' not found -function "%s" not found -function %s not found - -I think two kinds of quotes is looking messy. Personal suggestion: -double quotes. - - -Capitalization and punctuation ------------------------------- - -Which one? - -ERROR: Permission denied. -ERROR: Permission denied -ERROR: permission denied - -I have personally used the GNU-recommended way which is the third, mostly -just because it is *some* standardized way. I don't have a strong feeling -about the initial capitalization, but I'm against the periods except when -the message is really a sentence and it contains some other punctuation -(commas, etc.) or the message consists of more than one sentence. - - -Grammatical structure and choice of words ------------------------------------------ - -There are many others besides the above choices: - -ERROR: Permission was denied. -ERROR: You don't have permission to do . -ERROR: Permission to do was denied. -ERROR: : Permission denied - -In other cases there's a sea of possibilities: - -couldn't find THING -can't find THING -THING wasn't found -unable to locate THING -lookup of THING failed -THING doesn't exist - -Strictly speaking, there are at least four different meanings among those -six messages, yet they're used mostly randomly. - -There are a number of things to think about here: active vs passive, can -vs could, complete sentence vs telegram style, use of colons, addressing -the user with "you [cannot...]". - -And please let's not have the program talk in the "I"-form ("I have rolled -back the current transaction ..."). - - - -More esoteric discussions are also possible, but I'm going to postpone -those. ;-) However, I think it's worth working on this and perhaps -putting together a "manual of style" that applies to all parts of -PostgreSQL. This would significantly improve the overall perceived -quality. Some projects like KDE, GNU, and GCC have teams that discuss -these kinds of things and it's definitely showing. - --- -Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net - - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate -subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your -message can get through to the mailing list cleanly - -From pgsql-hackers-owner+M16128=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org Fri Nov 30 13:39:41 2001 -Return-path: -Received: from rs.postgresql.org (server1.pgsql.org [64.39.15.238] (may be forged)) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id fAUJdfR29066 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:39:41 -0500 (EST) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by rs.postgresql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAUJXkR15701 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:36:17 -0600 (CST) - (envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M16128=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org) -Received: from corvette.mascari.com (dhcp065-024-158-068.columbus.rr.com [65.24.158.68]) - by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAUJMnm01940 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:22:49 -0500 (EST) - (envelope-from mascarm@mascari.com) -Received: from mascari.com (ferrari.mascari.com [192.168.2.1]) - by corvette.mascari.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA20637; - Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:16:52 -0500 -Message-ID: <3C07DBAD.A9735975@mascari.com> -Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:19:09 -0500 -From: Mike Mascari -Organization: Mascari Development Inc. -X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) -X-Accept-Language: en -MIME-Version: 1.0 -To: Peter Eisentraut -cc: PostgreSQL Development -Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Backend error message style issues -References: -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: OR - -Peter Eisentraut wrote: -> -> Now that we've gone through nearly one development cycle with national -> language support, I'd like to bring up a number of issues concerning the -> style of the backend error messages that make life difficult, but probably -> not only for the translators but for users as well. Not all of these are -> strictly translation issues, but the message catalogs make for a good -> overview of what's going on. - -For what its worth, Oracle 8 ships with an error.txt file which -dictates the message standards to which their products comply. -Roughly: - -Size Of Message: ---------------- - -Cannot exceed 76 characters, even when embedded format specifiers -are apart of the message. Only -start-up and system-dependent messages can exceed 76 characters. - -Simple Language: ---------------- - -Use non-cryptic messages and overly technical language. - -Upper vs. Lowercase: -------------------- - -Use uppercase for commands and keywords, lowercase for message -wording, including the first letter (which agrees with your use, -Peter). - -Commands, Keywords, Parameter Values: ------------------------------------- - -When possible, give the command, keyword and parameters used in the -message. - -BAD: The relation could not be created -GOOD: CREATE TABLE failed for table "foo" because the disk is full - -Period: ------- - -Do not end messages with a period (also agrees with your -conclusion). - -Numbers: -------- - -Don't enclose numbers with special characters. For example: - -BAD: rows returned by subquery (3) exceeded limit (1) -GOOD: the subquery returned 3 rows exceeding the 1 row limit - -Quotes: ------- - -Don't use single or double quotes to emphasize a text variable or -command - -Single Quotes: -------------- - -Never use them. - -Double Quotes: -------------- - -Always and only use them to identify database objects. - -BAD: Unable to drop table employees -GOOD: DROP TABLE of "employees" failed due to referential integrity -constraints - -Ellipses: --------- - -Don't use them. - -BAD: Unable to drop column mascarm.employees.salary -GOOD: ALTER TABLE was unable to drop the column "salary" table -"employees" schema "mascarm" - -Parentheses: ------------ - -Always and only use parentheses for constraint names - -BAD: not null constraint ri_employees violated -GOOD: not null constraint (ri_employees) violated - -Brackets: --------- - -Always and only used for program arguments - -Grammar: -------- - -Use complete sentences whenever possible without the trailing -period. Don't use multiple sentences. Use the active voice. Don't -use an aggressive tone. - -Style: ------ - -Make positive suggestions. Explain what is invalid and what is -valid. - -Example: - -BAD: file name invalid -BETTER: COPY failed because the file name was too long - -Routine names: -------------- - -Do not use routine names in messages. Again, agrees with you, Peter. - -FWIW, - -Mike Mascari -mascarm@mascari.com - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org - -From pgsql-hackers-owner+M16130=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org Fri Nov 30 14:09:48 2001 -Return-path: -Received: from rs.postgresql.org (server1.pgsql.org [64.39.15.238] (may be forged)) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id fAUK9lR02095 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:09:48 -0500 (EST) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by rs.postgresql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAUK3MR16820 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:05:48 -0600 (CST) - (envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M16130=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org) -Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242]) - by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAUJnLm02954 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:49:21 -0500 (EST) - (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) - by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAUJnEi10307; - Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:49:14 -0500 (EST) -To: Peter Eisentraut -cc: PostgreSQL Development -Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Backend error message style issues -In-Reply-To: -References: -Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut - message dated "Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:12:16 +0100" -Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:49:14 -0500 -Message-ID: <10303.1007149754@sss.pgh.pa.us> -From: Tom Lane -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: OR - -Peter Eisentraut writes: -> I hope we can work through all of these during the next development -> period. - -Too bad we didn't do it *before* doing a lot of translation work :-(. - -Yes, I agree that a pass of rationalizing the error messages would be -useful. Might want to think about that old bugaboo, error codes, -while we're at it. Also the perennial complaint that "ERROR" and -"DEBUG" macros tend to conflict with other things. As long as we're -going to touch many/all of the elog() calls, couldn't we try to clean -up all these issues? - -> Which is better: - -> function '%s' not found -> function "%s" not found -> function %s not found - -Given that 'x' and "x" mean very different things in SQL, I think that -the first form is just plain wrong when an identifier is involved. -Unfortunately a lot of older code uses that style. I've tried to use -double quotes in new messages, but have restrained myself from wholesale -changes of existing messages. - -> More esoteric discussions are also possible, but I'm going to postpone -> those. ;-) However, I think it's worth working on this and perhaps -> putting together a "manual of style" that applies to all parts of -> PostgreSQL. This would significantly improve the overall perceived -> quality. - -Sounds like a plan to me: put together a style guide first, and then -make a pass through the code to try to implement it. - - regards, tom lane - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org - -From pgsql-hackers-owner+M25090@postgresql.org Wed Jul 17 14:27:47 2002 -Return-path: -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g6HIRke20336 - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:27:46 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP - id A5EC0475931; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:27:42 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from klamath.dyndns.org (CPE002078144ae0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.102.202.35]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8A74758F5 - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:27:39 -0400 (EDT) -Received: by klamath.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) - id D98827015; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:27:39 -0400 (EDT) -Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:27:39 -0400 -To: PostgreSQL Hackers -Subject: [HACKERS] error codes -Message-ID: <20020717182739.GB5542@klamath.dyndns.org> -Mail-Followup-To: PostgreSQL Hackers -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -Content-Disposition: inline -User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i -From: nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: ORr - -I'd like to implement error codes. I think they would be pretty useful, -although there are a few difficulties in the implementation I'd like -to get some input on. - -Should every elog() have an error code? I'm not sure -- there are many -elog() calls that will never been seen by the user, since the error -they represent will be caught before control reaches the elog (e.g. -parse errors, internal consistency checks, multiple elog(ERROR) -for the same user error, etc.) Perhaps for those error messages -that don't have numbers, we could just give them ERRNO_UNKNOWN or -a similar constant. - -How should the backend code signal an error with an error number? -Perhaps we could report errors with error numbers via a separate -function, which would take the error number as its only param. -For example: - -error(ERRNO_REF_INT_VIOLATION); - -The problem here is that many errors will require more information -that that, in order for the client to handle them properly. For -example, how should a COPY indicate that an RI violation has -occured? Ideally, we'd like to allow the client application to -know that in line a, column b, the literal value 'c' was -not found in the referenced column d of the referenced table d. - -How should the error number be sent to the client, and would this -require an FE/BE change? I think we can avoid that: including the -error number in the error message itself, make PQgetErrorMessage() -(and similar funcs) smart enough to remove the error number, and -add a separate function (such as PQgetErrorNumber() ) to report -the error number, if there is one. - -On a related note, it would be nice to get a consistent style of -punctuation for elog() messages -- currently, some of them end -in a period (e.g. "Database xxx does not exist in the system -catalog."), while the majority do not. Which is better? - -Also, I think it was Bruce who mentioned that it would be nice -to add function names, source files, and/or line numbers to error -messages, instead of the current inconsistent method of sometimes -specifying the function name in the elog() message. Would this -be a good idea? Should all errors include this information? - -It would be relatively easy to replace elog() with a macro of -the form: - -#define elog(...) real_elog(__FILE__, __LINE__, __VA_ARGS__) - -And then adjust real_elog() to report that information as -appropriate. - -Cheers, - -Neil - --- -Neil Conway -PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command - (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) - -From pgsql-hackers-owner+M25094@postgresql.org Wed Jul 17 15:58:08 2002 -Return-path: -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g6HJw7e27032 - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:58:07 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP - id 73DA3475C3D; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:58:00 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA71475D6F - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:57:56 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) - by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6HJvuAl016463; - Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:57:56 -0400 (EDT) -To: nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) -cc: PostgreSQL Hackers -Subject: Re: [HACKERS] error codes -In-Reply-To: <20020717182739.GB5542@klamath.dyndns.org> -References: <20020717182739.GB5542@klamath.dyndns.org> -Comments: In-reply-to nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) - message dated "Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:27:39 -0400" -Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:57:56 -0400 -Message-ID: <16462.1026935876@sss.pgh.pa.us> -From: Tom Lane -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: OR - -nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) writes: -> Should every elog() have an error code? - -I believe we decided that it'd be okay to use one or two codes defined -like "internal error", "corrupted data", etc for all the elogs that are -not-supposed-to-happen conditions. What error codes are really for is -distinguishing different kinds of user mistakes, and so that's where -you need specificness. - -> How should the backend code signal an error with an error number? - -Please read some of the archived discussions about this. All the points -you mention have been brought up before. - - regards, tom lane - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? - -http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html - -From pgsql-hackers-owner+M25095@postgresql.org Wed Jul 17 16:18:08 2002 -Return-path: -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g6HKI8e28852 - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:18:08 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP - id 68FAB475C69; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:18:05 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from klamath.dyndns.org (CPE002078144ae0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.102.202.35]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7867847585D - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:17:57 -0400 (EDT) -Received: by klamath.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) - id A182C7015; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:17:58 -0400 (EDT) -Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:17:58 -0400 -To: Tom Lane -cc: PostgreSQL Hackers -Subject: Re: [HACKERS] error codes -Message-ID: <20020717201758.GA6846@klamath.dyndns.org> -Mail-Followup-To: Tom Lane , - PostgreSQL Hackers -References: <20020717182739.GB5542@klamath.dyndns.org> <16462.1026935876@sss.pgh.pa.us> -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -Content-Disposition: inline -In-Reply-To: <16462.1026935876@sss.pgh.pa.us> -User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i -From: nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: OR - -On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:57:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: -> nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) writes: -> > Should every elog() have an error code? -> -> I believe we decided that it'd be okay to use one or two codes defined -> like "internal error", "corrupted data", etc for all the elogs that are -> not-supposed-to-happen conditions. - -Ok, makes sense to me. - -> > How should the backend code signal an error with an error number? -> -> Please read some of the archived discussions about this. All the points -> you mention have been brought up before. - -Woops -- I wasn't aware that this had been discussed before, my apologies. -I'm reading the archives now... - -Peter: are you planning to implement this? - -Cheers, - -Neil - --- -Neil Conway -PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command - (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) - -From pgsql-hackers-owner+M25097@postgresql.org Wed Jul 17 18:04:36 2002 -Return-path: -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g6HM4Ze09359 - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:04:35 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP - id AD154475D78; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:04:29 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5541A475C95 - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:04:21 -0400 (EDT) -Received: (from pgman@localhost) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g6HM4Hi09355; - Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:04:17 -0400 (EDT) -From: Bruce Momjian -Message-ID: <200207172204.g6HM4Hi09355@candle.pha.pa.us> -Subject: Re: [HACKERS] error codes -In-Reply-To: <20020717182739.GB5542@klamath.dyndns.org> -To: Neil Conway -Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:04:17 -0400 (EDT) -cc: PostgreSQL Hackers -X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99 (25)] -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=ELM1026943457-25421-1_ -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: OR - ---ELM1026943457-25421-1_ -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII - - -Neil, attached are three email messages dealing with error message -wording. - -I like Tom's idea of coding only the messages that are common/user -errors and leaving the others with a catch-all code. - -We now have more elog levels in 7.3, so it should be easier to classify -the messages. - -I can see this job as several parts: - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -Cleanup of error wording, removal of function names. See attached -emails for possible standard. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -Reporting of file, line, function reporting using GUC/SET variable. For -function names I see in the gcc 3.1 docs at -http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.1/cpp/Standard-Predefined-Macros.html: - - C99 introduces __func__, and GCC has provided __FUNCTION__ for a long - time. Both of these are strings containing the name of the current - function (there are slight semantic differences; see the GCC manual). - Neither of them is a macro; the preprocessor does not know the name of - the current function. They tend to be useful in conjunction with - __FILE__ and __LINE__, though. - -My gcc 2.95 (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024) supports both __FUNCTION__ and -__func__, even though they are not documented in the info manual pages I -have. I think we will need a configure.in test for this because it -isn't a macro you can #ifdef. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -Actual error code numbers/letters. I think the new elog levels will -help with this. We have to decide if we want error numbers, or some -pneumonic like NOATTR or CONSTVIOL. I suggest the latter. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -I think we have plenty of time to get this done for 7.3. - --- - Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us - pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 - + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue - + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 - ---ELM1026943457-25421-1_ -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -Content-Type: text/plain -Content-Disposition: inline; filename="/bjm/error" - ->From pgsql-hackers-owner+M16120=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org Fri Nov 30 12:14:19 2001 -Return-path: -Received: from rs.postgresql.org (server1.pgsql.org [64.39.15.238] (may be forged)) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id fAUIEIR21802 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:14:18 -0500 (EST) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by rs.postgresql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAUI6ER13094 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:11:00 -0600 (CST) - (envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M16120=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org) -Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.200]) - by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAUI58m98870 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:05:08 -0500 (EST) - (envelope-from peter_e@gmx.net) -Received: from [195.20.224.208] (helo=mrvdom01.schlund.de) - by moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) - id 169s27-00049P-00 - for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:05:07 +0100 -Received: from p3e9e6fa2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([62.158.111.162]) - by mrvdom01.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) - id 169s21-0001UP-00 - for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:05:03 +0100 -Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:12:16 +0100 (CET) -From: Peter Eisentraut -X-Sender: -To: PostgreSQL Development -Subject: [HACKERS] Backend error message style issues -Message-ID: -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: ORr - -Now that we've gone through nearly one development cycle with national -language support, I'd like to bring up a number of issues concerning the -style of the backend error messages that make life difficult, but probably -not only for the translators but for users as well. Not all of these are -strictly translation issues, but the message catalogs make for a good -overview of what's going on. - -I hope we can work through all of these during the next development -period. - -Prefixing messages with command names -------------------------------------- - -For instance, - -| CREATE DATABASE: permission denied - -This "command: message" style is typical for command-line programs and -it's pretty useful there if you run many commands in a pipe. The same -usefulness could probably be derived if you run many SQL commands in a -function. (Just "permission denied" would be very confusing there!) - -If we want to use that style we should make it consistent and we should -automate it. Via the "command tag" mechanism we already know what command -we're executing, so we can automatically prefix all messages that way. It -could even be switched off by the user if it's deemed annoying. - - -Prefixing messages with function names --------------------------------------- - -The function names obviously have no meaning to the user. It is claimed -that they allow a developer to locate the place the error was raised -faster, but that's only half the truth. Firstly, this whole thing doesn't -work if the displayed name of the function was actually passed in from -elsewhere. Then it takes you three times longer to locate the source -because you *think* you know where it was but it's not there. Secondly, -a developer doesn't have the need to locate every error. For instance, - -| ExecAppend: rejected due to CHECK constraint foo - -There's no need to debug anything there, it's a perfectly normal use -situation. - -I think the key here is to distinguish error messages that are perfectly -normal user-level events from messages which really represent an "assert -failure, but continue gracefully", such as - -| initGISTstate: numberOfAttributes %d > %d - -The latter could better be written something like - -| BETTER_BE_TRUE(index->rd_att->natts > INDEX_MAX_KEYS); - -we could lead to an error message in the style of an assert failure, -including the expression in question and file and line information (and -bug reporting suggestions). This way the developer doesn't have to write -any message text at all but still gets much better information to locate -the source. (E.g., note that the tested variable isn't even called -"numberOfAttributes".) - -The exact API could be tuned to include some other information such as an -informal message, but I think something along these lines needs to be -worked out. - - -Quoting -------- - -Which is better: - -function '%s' not found -function "%s" not found -function %s not found - -I think two kinds of quotes is looking messy. Personal suggestion: -double quotes. - - -Capitalization and punctuation ------------------------------- - -Which one? - -ERROR: Permission denied. -ERROR: Permission denied -ERROR: permission denied - -I have personally used the GNU-recommended way which is the third, mostly -just because it is *some* standardized way. I don't have a strong feeling -about the initial capitalization, but I'm against the periods except when -the message is really a sentence and it contains some other punctuation -(commas, etc.) or the message consists of more than one sentence. - - -Grammatical structure and choice of words ------------------------------------------ - -There are many others besides the above choices: - -ERROR: Permission was denied. -ERROR: You don't have permission to do . -ERROR: Permission to do was denied. -ERROR: : Permission denied - -In other cases there's a sea of possibilities: - -couldn't find THING -can't find THING -THING wasn't found -unable to locate THING -lookup of THING failed -THING doesn't exist - -Strictly speaking, there are at least four different meanings among those -six messages, yet they're used mostly randomly. - -There are a number of things to think about here: active vs passive, can -vs could, complete sentence vs telegram style, use of colons, addressing -the user with "you [cannot...]". - -And please let's not have the program talk in the "I"-form ("I have rolled -back the current transaction ..."). - - - -More esoteric discussions are also possible, but I'm going to postpone -those. ;-) However, I think it's worth working on this and perhaps -putting together a "manual of style" that applies to all parts of -PostgreSQL. This would significantly improve the overall perceived -quality. Some projects like KDE, GNU, and GCC have teams that discuss -these kinds of things and it's definitely showing. - --- -Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net - - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate -subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your -message can get through to the mailing list cleanly - ->From pgsql-hackers-owner+M16128=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org Fri Nov 30 13:39:41 2001 -Return-path: -Received: from rs.postgresql.org (server1.pgsql.org [64.39.15.238] (may be forged)) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id fAUJdfR29066 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:39:41 -0500 (EST) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by rs.postgresql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAUJXkR15701 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:36:17 -0600 (CST) - (envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M16128=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org) -Received: from corvette.mascari.com (dhcp065-024-158-068.columbus.rr.com [65.24.158.68]) - by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAUJMnm01940 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:22:49 -0500 (EST) - (envelope-from mascarm@mascari.com) -Received: from mascari.com (ferrari.mascari.com [192.168.2.1]) - by corvette.mascari.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA20637; - Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:16:52 -0500 -Message-ID: <3C07DBAD.A9735975@mascari.com> -Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:19:09 -0500 -From: Mike Mascari -Organization: Mascari Development Inc. -X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) -X-Accept-Language: en -MIME-Version: 1.0 -To: Peter Eisentraut -cc: PostgreSQL Development -Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Backend error message style issues -References: -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: OR - -Peter Eisentraut wrote: -> -> Now that we've gone through nearly one development cycle with national -> language support, I'd like to bring up a number of issues concerning the -> style of the backend error messages that make life difficult, but probably -> not only for the translators but for users as well. Not all of these are -> strictly translation issues, but the message catalogs make for a good -> overview of what's going on. - -For what its worth, Oracle 8 ships with an error.txt file which -dictates the message standards to which their products comply. -Roughly: - -Size Of Message: ---------------- - -Cannot exceed 76 characters, even when embedded format specifiers -are apart of the message. Only -start-up and system-dependent messages can exceed 76 characters. - -Simple Language: ---------------- - -Use non-cryptic messages and overly technical language. - -Upper vs. Lowercase: -------------------- - -Use uppercase for commands and keywords, lowercase for message -wording, including the first letter (which agrees with your use, -Peter). - -Commands, Keywords, Parameter Values: ------------------------------------- - -When possible, give the command, keyword and parameters used in the -message. - -BAD: The relation could not be created -GOOD: CREATE TABLE failed for table "foo" because the disk is full - -Period: ------- - -Do not end messages with a period (also agrees with your -conclusion). - -Numbers: -------- - -Don't enclose numbers with special characters. For example: - -BAD: rows returned by subquery (3) exceeded limit (1) -GOOD: the subquery returned 3 rows exceeding the 1 row limit - -Quotes: ------- - -Don't use single or double quotes to emphasize a text variable or -command - -Single Quotes: -------------- - -Never use them. - -Double Quotes: -------------- - -Always and only use them to identify database objects. - -BAD: Unable to drop table employees -GOOD: DROP TABLE of "employees" failed due to referential integrity -constraints - -Ellipses: --------- - -Don't use them. - -BAD: Unable to drop column mascarm.employees.salary -GOOD: ALTER TABLE was unable to drop the column "salary" table -"employees" schema "mascarm" - -Parentheses: ------------ - -Always and only use parentheses for constraint names - -BAD: not null constraint ri_employees violated -GOOD: not null constraint (ri_employees) violated - -Brackets: --------- - -Always and only used for program arguments - -Grammar: -------- - -Use complete sentences whenever possible without the trailing -period. Don't use multiple sentences. Use the active voice. Don't -use an aggressive tone. - -Style: ------ - -Make positive suggestions. Explain what is invalid and what is -valid. - -Example: - -BAD: file name invalid -BETTER: COPY failed because the file name was too long - -Routine names: -------------- - -Do not use routine names in messages. Again, agrees with you, Peter. - -FWIW, - -Mike Mascari -mascarm@mascari.com - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org - ->From pgsql-hackers-owner+M16130=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org Fri Nov 30 14:09:48 2001 -Return-path: -Received: from rs.postgresql.org (server1.pgsql.org [64.39.15.238] (may be forged)) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id fAUK9lR02095 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:09:48 -0500 (EST) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by rs.postgresql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAUK3MR16820 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:05:48 -0600 (CST) - (envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M16130=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org) -Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242]) - by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAUJnLm02954 - for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:49:21 -0500 (EST) - (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) - by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAUJnEi10307; - Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:49:14 -0500 (EST) -To: Peter Eisentraut -cc: PostgreSQL Development -Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Backend error message style issues -In-Reply-To: -References: -Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut - message dated "Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:12:16 +0100" -Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:49:14 -0500 -Message-ID: <10303.1007149754@sss.pgh.pa.us> -From: Tom Lane -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: OR - -Peter Eisentraut writes: -> I hope we can work through all of these during the next development -> period. - -Too bad we didn't do it *before* doing a lot of translation work :-(. - -Yes, I agree that a pass of rationalizing the error messages would be -useful. Might want to think about that old bugaboo, error codes, -while we're at it. Also the perennial complaint that "ERROR" and -"DEBUG" macros tend to conflict with other things. As long as we're -going to touch many/all of the elog() calls, couldn't we try to clean -up all these issues? - -> Which is better: - -> function '%s' not found -> function "%s" not found -> function %s not found - -Given that 'x' and "x" mean very different things in SQL, I think that -the first form is just plain wrong when an identifier is involved. -Unfortunately a lot of older code uses that style. I've tried to use -double quotes in new messages, but have restrained myself from wholesale -changes of existing messages. - -> More esoteric discussions are also possible, but I'm going to postpone -> those. ;-) However, I think it's worth working on this and perhaps -> putting together a "manual of style" that applies to all parts of -> PostgreSQL. This would significantly improve the overall perceived -> quality. - -Sounds like a plan to me: put together a style guide first, and then -make a pass through the code to try to implement it. - - regards, tom lane - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org - - ---ELM1026943457-25421-1_ -Content-Type: text/plain -Content-Disposition: inline -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -MIME-Version: 1.0 - - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org - ---ELM1026943457-25421-1_-- - -From pgsql-hackers-owner+M25104@postgresql.org Wed Jul 17 18:30:49 2002 -Return-path: -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g6HMUme12537 - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:30:48 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP - id BF5D6475D9D; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:30:42 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20611475DCB - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:30:35 -0400 (EDT) -Received: (qmail 9427 invoked by uid 0); 17 Jul 2002 22:30:37 -0000 -Received: from pd902f0de.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (217.2.240.222) - by mail.gmx.net (mp007-rz3) with SMTP; 17 Jul 2002 22:30:37 -0000 -Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:33:22 +0200 (CEST) -From: Peter Eisentraut -X-X-Sender: peter@localhost.localdomain -To: Neil Conway -cc: PostgreSQL Hackers -Subject: Re: [HACKERS] error codes -In-Reply-To: <20020717182739.GB5542@klamath.dyndns.org> -Message-ID: -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: OR - -Neil Conway writes: - -> I'd like to implement error codes. I think they would be pretty useful, -> although there are a few difficulties in the implementation I'd like -> to get some input on. - -OK, allow me to pass on to you the accumulated wisdom on this topic. :-) - -> Should every elog() have an error code? - -The set of error codes should primarily be that defined by SQL99 part 2 -clause 22 "Status codes" and PostgreSQL extensions that follow that -spirit. That means that all those "can't happen" or "all is lost anyway" -types should be lumped (perhaps in some implicit way) under "internal -error". That means, yes, an error code should be returned in every case -of an error, but it doesn't have to be a distinct error code for every -condition. - -> How should the backend code signal an error with an error number? - -> The problem here is that many errors will require more information -> that that, in order for the client to handle them properly. For -> example, how should a COPY indicate that an RI violation has -> occured? Ideally, we'd like to allow the client application to -> know that in line a, column b, the literal value 'c' was -> not found in the referenced column d of the referenced table d. - -Precisely. You will find that SQL99 part 2 clause 19 "Diagnostics -management" defines all the fields that form part of a diagnostic (i.e., -error or notice). This includes for example, fields that contain the name -and schema of the table that was involved, if appropriate. (Again, -appropriate PostgreSQL extensions could be made.) It is recommendable -that this scheme be followed, so PL/pgSQL and ECPG, to name some -candidates, could implement the GET DIAGNOSTICS statement as in the -standard. (Notice that, for example, a diagnostic still contains a text -message in addition to a code.) - -> How should the error number be sent to the client, and would this -> require an FE/BE change? I think we can avoid that: including the -> error number in the error message itself, make PQgetErrorMessage() -> (and similar funcs) smart enough to remove the error number, and -> add a separate function (such as PQgetErrorNumber() ) to report -> the error number, if there is one. - -I would advise against trying to cram everything into a string. Consider -the extra fields explained above. Consider being nice to old clients. -Also, libpq allows that more than one error message might arrive per query -cycle. Currently, the error messages are concatenated. That won't work -anymore. You need a new API anyway. You need a new API for notices, too. - -One possiblity to justify a protocol change is to break something else -with it, like a new copy protocol. - -> On a related note, it would be nice to get a consistent style of -> punctuation for elog() messages -- currently, some of them end -> in a period (e.g. "Database xxx does not exist in the system -> catalog."), while the majority do not. Which is better? - -Yup, we've talked about that some time ago. I have a style guide mostly -worked out for discussion. - -> It would be relatively easy to replace elog() with a macro of -> the form: -> -> #define elog(...) real_elog(__FILE__, __LINE__, __VA_ARGS__) -> -> And then adjust real_elog() to report that information as -> appropriate. - -And it would be relatively easy to break every old compiler that way... - --- -Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net - - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? - -http://archives.postgresql.org - -From pgsql-hackers-owner+M25114@postgresql.org Wed Jul 17 21:57:52 2002 -Return-path: -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g6I1vpe07438 - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:57:52 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP - id 0E63047593C; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:57:47 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from houston.familyhealth.com.au (i231-006.nv.iinet.net.au [203.59.231.6]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA91F47585D - for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:57:41 -0400 (EDT) -Received: (from root@localhost) - by houston.familyhealth.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6I1viW22817 - for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:57:44 +0800 (WST) - (envelope-from chriskl@familyhealth.com.au) -Received: from mariner (mariner.internal [192.168.0.101]) - by houston.familyhealth.com.au (8.11.6/8.9.3) with SMTP id g6I1vhV22728; - Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:57:43 +0800 (WST) -From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" -To: "Neil Conway" , - "PostgreSQL Hackers" -Subject: Re: [HACKERS] error codes -Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:57:56 +0800 -Message-ID: -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; - charset="us-ascii" -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -X-Priority: 3 (Normal) -X-MSMail-Priority: Normal -X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) -In-Reply-To: <20020717182739.GB5542@klamath.dyndns.org> -X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 -Importance: Normal -X-scanner: scanned by Inflex 0.1.5c - (http://www.inflex.co.za/) -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Status: OR - -> Should every elog() have an error code? I'm not sure -- there are many -> elog() calls that will never been seen by the user, since the error -> they represent will be caught before control reaches the elog (e.g. -> parse errors, internal consistency checks, multiple elog(ERROR) -> for the same user error, etc.) Perhaps for those error messages -> that don't have numbers, we could just give them ERRNO_UNKNOWN or -> a similar constant. - -It might be cool to a little command utility "pg_error" or whatever that you -pass an error code to and it prints out a very detailed description of the -problem... - -Chris - - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? - -http://archives.postgresql.org - -From pgsql-hackers-owner+M25119@postgresql.org Thu Jul 18 04:01:40 2002 -Return-path: -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g6I81de14995 - for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 04:01:40 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP - id 38C49475E0D; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 04:01:33 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from smxsat1.smxs.net (smxsat1.smxs.net [213.150.10.1]) - by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A1B475DB6 - for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 04:01:26 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from m01x1.s-mxs.net [10.3.55.201] - by smxsat1.smxs.net - over TLS secured channel - with XWall v3.21e ; - Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:01:23 +0200 -Received: from m0102.s-mxs.net [10.3.55.2] - by m01x1.s-mxs.net - with XWall v3.21b ; - Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:01:21 +0200 -Received: from m0114.s-mxs.net ([10.3.55.14]) by m0102.s-mxs.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4453); - Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:01:20 +0200 -X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 -content-class: urn:content-classes:message -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; - charset="iso-8859-1" -Subject: Re: [HACKERS] error codes -Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:01:20 +0200 -Message-ID: <46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA4961E24@m0114.s-mxs.net> -Thread-Topic: [HACKERS] error codes -Thread-Index: AcIt3fXLfLUm5ueDTfKp02tm+iyO0AAUPF/Q -From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" -To: "Bruce Momjian" , - "Neil Conway" -cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" -X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jul 2002 08:01:20.0584 (UTC) FILETIME=[4D5A6480:01C22E31] -Precedence: bulk -Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g6I81de14995 -Status: ORr - - -Bruce wrote: -> Actual error code numbers/letters. I think the new elog levels will -> help with this. We have to decide if we want error numbers, or some -> pneumonic like NOATTR or CONSTVIOL. I suggest the latter. - -Since there is an actual standard for error codes, I would strongly suggest -to adhere. The standardized codes are SQLSTATE a char(5) (well standardized -for many classes of db errors). Also common, but not so standardized is SQLCODE -a long (only a very few are standardized, like 100 = 'no data found'). -And also sqlca. Also look at ecpg for sqlcode and sqlca. - -A Quote from dec rdb: --------------------------------------------------------------------- - o SQLCODE-This is the original SQL error handling mechanism. - It is an integer value. SQLCODE differentiates among errors - (negative numbers), warnings (positive numbers), succesful - completion (0), and a special code of 100, which means no - data. SQLCODE is a deprecated feature of the ANSI/ISO SQL - standard. - - o SQLCA-This is an extension of the SQLCODE error handling - mechanism. It contains other context information that - supplements the SQLCODE value. SQLCA is not part of the - ANSI/ISO SQL standard. However, many foreign databases such - as DB2 and ORACLE RDBMS have defined proprietary semantics and - syntax to implement it. - - o SQLSTATE-This is the error handling mechanism for the ANSI/ISO - SQL standard. The SQLSTATE value is a character string that is - associated with diagnostic information. To use the SQLSTATE - status parameter, you must specify the SQL92 dialect and - compile your module using DEC Rdb Version 6.0. --------------------------------------------------------------------- - -Andreas - ----------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- -TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster - -- 2.40.0