From 5abbd606200d53f68b57b770ac338c2e9a696abc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Douglas Gregor Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 02:49:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Make a note for the C++0x future, when we'll have to revisit the jump-diagnostics handling for variables without initializers git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@97929 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Sema/JumpDiagnostics.cpp | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/Sema/JumpDiagnostics.cpp b/lib/Sema/JumpDiagnostics.cpp index 7cf207f77a..1c761b9503 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/JumpDiagnostics.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/JumpDiagnostics.cpp @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static unsigned GetDiagForGotoScopeDecl(const Decl *D, bool isCPlusPlus) { return diag::note_protected_by_cleanup; if (VD->hasAttr()) return diag::note_protected_by___block; + // FIXME: In C++0x, we have to check more conditions than "did we + // just give it an initializer?". See 6.7p3. if (isCPlusPlus && VD->hasLocalStorage() && VD->hasInit()) return diag::note_protected_by_variable_init; -- 2.40.0