From 57fe02b859b8bc703f9041e580fb4cba89f3fa2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Holsman Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 06:08:12 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] does anyone need/use ndbm? if so should we make it a apr_util_dbm DB type? PR: Obtained from: Submitted by: Reviewed by: git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@92617 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 4b0a9a987e..b0e9ea742c 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2001/12/27 06:03:13 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2001/12/27 06:08:12 $] Release: @@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: a userlist via dbm, which has to remain readable between builds/machines, etc. The use-multiple database schema for apr-util would let us do this with just apr, though." + Ian says: "multi-dbm is in, but it still has ndbm support hardcoded + is this still required? isn't ndbm supported via gdbm?" + * Integrate mod_dav. Some additional items remaining: -- 2.50.1