From 56f90d72c89f5ba87c6d735c71936b4f7292b882 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrea Di Biagio Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 12:07:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [InstCombine] Teach the udiv folding logic how to handle constant expressions. This patch fixes PR30366. Function foldUDivShl() worked under the assumption that one of the values in input to the function was always an instance of llvm::Instruction. However, function visitUDivOperand() (the only user of foldUDivShl) was clearly violating that precondition; internally, visitUDivOperand() uses pattern matches to check the operands of a udiv. Pattern matchers for binary operators know how to handle both Instruction and ConstantExpr values. This patch fixes the problem in foldUDivShl(). Now we use pattern matchers instead of explicit casts to Instruction. The reduced test case from PR30366 has been added to test file InstCombine/udiv-simplify.ll. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24565 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282398 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- .../InstCombine/InstCombineMulDivRem.cpp | 25 +++++++++++-------- test/Transforms/InstCombine/udiv-simplify.ll | 15 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineMulDivRem.cpp b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineMulDivRem.cpp index cd31c63ff28..e1e3cbc5195 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineMulDivRem.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineMulDivRem.cpp @@ -991,19 +991,22 @@ static Instruction *foldUDivNegCst(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, } // X udiv (C1 << N), where C1 is "1< X >> (N+C2) +// X udiv (zext (C1 << N)), where C1 is "1< X >> (N+C2) static Instruction *foldUDivShl(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, const BinaryOperator &I, InstCombiner &IC) { - Instruction *ShiftLeft = cast(Op1); - if (isa(ShiftLeft)) - ShiftLeft = cast(ShiftLeft->getOperand(0)); - - const APInt &CI = - cast(ShiftLeft->getOperand(0))->getUniqueInteger(); - Value *N = ShiftLeft->getOperand(1); - if (CI != 1) - N = IC.Builder->CreateAdd(N, ConstantInt::get(N->getType(), CI.logBase2())); - if (ZExtInst *Z = dyn_cast(Op1)) - N = IC.Builder->CreateZExt(N, Z->getDestTy()); + Value *ShiftLeft; + if (!match(Op1, m_ZExt(m_Value(ShiftLeft)))) + ShiftLeft = Op1; + + const APInt *CI; + Value *N; + if (!match(ShiftLeft, m_Shl(m_APInt(CI), m_Value(N)))) + llvm_unreachable("match should never fail here!"); + if (*CI != 1) + N = IC.Builder->CreateAdd(N, + ConstantInt::get(N->getType(), CI->logBase2())); + if (Op1 != ShiftLeft) + N = IC.Builder->CreateZExt(N, Op1->getType()); BinaryOperator *LShr = BinaryOperator::CreateLShr(Op0, N); if (I.isExact()) LShr->setIsExact(); diff --git a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/udiv-simplify.ll b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/udiv-simplify.ll index 296821f704c..6f43fee92a6 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/udiv-simplify.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/udiv-simplify.ll @@ -47,3 +47,18 @@ define i64 @test2_PR2274(i32 %x, i32 %v) nounwind { %z = sext i32 %r to i64 ret i64 %z } + +; The udiv should be simplified according to the rule: +; X udiv (C1 << N), where C1 is `1< X >> (N+C2) +@b = external global [1 x i16] + +define i32 @PR30366(i1 %a) { +; CHECK-LABEL: @PR30366( +; CHECK-NEXT: [[Z:%.*]] = zext i1 %a to i32 +; CHECK-NEXT: [[D:%.*]] = lshr i32 [[Z]], zext (i16 ptrtoint ([1 x i16]* @b to i16) to i32) +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[D]] +; + %z = zext i1 %a to i32 + %d = udiv i32 %z, zext (i16 shl (i16 1, i16 ptrtoint ([1 x i16]* @b to i16)) to i32) + ret i32 %d +} -- 2.50.1