From 54aa5ef7f2dbe979843daf0c7a0d98f6709da4e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Magnus Hagander Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 23:08:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix a couple of typos Noted by Peter Geoghegan --- doc/src/sgml/pgstatstatements.sgml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/pgstatstatements.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/pgstatstatements.sgml index c607710ccd..1fefeab229 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/pgstatstatements.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/pgstatstatements.sgml @@ -263,13 +263,13 @@ As a rule of thumb, an assumption of the stability or comparability - of querid values should be predicated on the the + of queryid values should be predicated on the the underlying catalog metadata and hash function implementation details exactly matching. Any two servers participating in any variety of replication based on physical WAL-replay can be expected - to have identical querid values for the same query. + to have identical queryid values for the same query. Logical replication schemes do not have replicas comparable in all - relevant regards, and so querid will not be a + relevant regards, and so queryid will not be a useful identifier for accumulating costs for the entire replica set. If in doubt, direct testing is recommended. -- 2.40.0