From 4e60b9c41fc5c31bee414ffacd66baf23102f6d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Justin Bogner Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 21:10:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] docs: Remove note about Identifiers being used for C++ operators C++ operators are represented by CXXOperatorName now, which is already documented. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@191559 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- docs/InternalsManual.rst | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/InternalsManual.rst b/docs/InternalsManual.rst index 59dd2f98d6..2e130c30c4 100644 --- a/docs/InternalsManual.rst +++ b/docs/InternalsManual.rst @@ -957,10 +957,6 @@ names are inside the ``DeclarationName`` class). The name is a simple identifier. Use ``N.getAsIdentifierInfo()`` to retrieve the corresponding ``IdentifierInfo*`` pointing to the actual identifier. - Note that C++ overloaded operators (e.g., "``operator+``") are represented as - special kinds of identifiers. Use ``IdentifierInfo``'s - ``getOverloadedOperatorID`` function to determine whether an identifier is an - overloaded operator name. ``ObjCZeroArgSelector``, ``ObjCOneArgSelector``, ``ObjCMultiArgSelector`` -- 2.50.1