From 48c9fbd35c02346cb88d684dd6f275bac6c26cd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:06:43 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update random test description because it fails less
 frequently now.

---
 doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml
index 95ee42b65e..ed3f7ad019 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml,v 1.37 2003/11/29 19:51:37 pgsql Exp $ -->
+<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml,v 1.38 2004/03/15 16:06:43 momjian Exp $ -->
 
  <chapter id="regress">
   <title id="regress-title">Regression Tests</title>
@@ -334,17 +334,13 @@ exclusion of those that don't.
     <para>
      There is at least one case in the <literal>random</literal> test
      script that is intended to produce random results. This causes
-     random to fail the regression test once in a while (perhaps once
-     in every five to ten trials).  Typing
+     random to fail the regression test occasionally.  Typing
 <programlisting>
 diff results/random.out expected/random.out
 </programlisting>
      should produce only one or a few lines of differences.  You need
      not worry unless the random test always fails in repeated
-     attempts.  (On the other hand, if the random test is
-     <emphasis>never</emphasis> reported to fail even in many trials
-     of the regression tests, you probably <emphasis>should</emphasis>
-     worry.)
+     attempts.
     </para>
    </sect2>
   </sect1>
-- 
2.40.0