From 3dba00bc31eb92ef1187f6dd78f2c7bb3c003710 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Popov <nikic@php.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 21:07:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix scope_is_known() for class constants

Here the active_op_array is still the surrounding file, but we
do know the scope.
---
 Zend/tests/bug69676.phpt | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 Zend/zend_compile.c      | 10 +++-------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Zend/tests/bug69676.phpt

diff --git a/Zend/tests/bug69676.phpt b/Zend/tests/bug69676.phpt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..54b9d40047
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Zend/tests/bug69676.phpt
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+--TEST--
+Bug #69676: Resolution of self::FOO in class constants not correct
+--FILE--
+<?php
+class A {
+	const myConst = "const in A";
+	const myDynConst = self::myConst;
+}
+
+class B extends A {
+	const myConst = "const in B";
+}
+
+var_dump(B::myDynConst);
+var_dump(A::myDynConst);
+?>
+--EXPECT--
+string(10) "const in A"
+string(10) "const in A"
diff --git a/Zend/zend_compile.c b/Zend/zend_compile.c
index 78f8ae3207..5647523f36 100644
--- a/Zend/zend_compile.c
+++ b/Zend/zend_compile.c
@@ -1325,14 +1325,10 @@ static inline zend_bool zend_is_scope_known() /* {{{ */
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (!CG(active_op_array)->function_name) {
-		/* A file/eval will be run in the including/eval'ing scope */
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	if (!CG(active_class_entry)) {
-		/* Not being in a scope is a known scope */
-		return 1;
+		/* The scope is known if we're in a free function (no scope), but not if we're in
+		 * a file/eval (which inherits including/eval'ing scope). */
+		return CG(active_op_array)->function_name != NULL;
 	}
 
 	/* For traits self etc refers to the using class, not the trait itself */
-- 
2.50.1