From 3cd40d8db643c241df9861c95e3f018fff5a46c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Slive Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:57:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] I certainly see the advantage of having SSL split out into another file. And indeed, that is the way that I would do it for my own server. But the default config file is really there for beginners, not for advanced users. Having multiple config files is bad for beginners because it makes it difficult to answer questions like "where do I put this config directive?" It also makes it more difficult to move a specific configuration from one server to another. Finally, it is just overall more intimidating to be faced with a bunch of files to edit, rather than one file that controls everything. Having said that, it does look like the overall feeling is that at least SSL should be split out, and I won't object (strongly). git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@91530 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index ec8bb3a25f..d77a605b17 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2001/10/17 15:32:22 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2001/10/17 15:57:04 $] Release: @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: * The recent split of proxy.conf and ssl.conf, good or bad? Split ssl.conf & proxy.conf: +1 OtherBill, Aaron, Ken Split out ssl.conf only: +1 Ryan, BrianH, Jim - Everything in httpd.conf: +1 Cliff, Justin + Everything in httpd.conf: +1 Cliff, Justin, Joshua * If any request gets to the core handler, without a flag that this r->filename was tested by dir/file_walk, we need to 500 at the very -- 2.40.0