From 39725de2fdf3fd4edd606bfca63fbbdc22bb5538 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Trawick Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:31:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] some things just aren't important when compared with those horrible whitespace problems :) git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@93153 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 9ca98808fd..9302ad2ecc 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/01 06:25:20 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/01 12:31:07 $] Release: @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: Justin says: "Is this really a showstopper? Most people won't be using -DNO_DETACH and will look at the error logs anyway." + Not a showstopper: trawick * ap_directory_walk skips some per-dir config merge functions if there is no "" block in the configuration @@ -90,7 +91,7 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: filename extensions. At minimum, some sort of +-[0-10] syntax seems like the quickest fix for a 2.0 gold release. Justin says: "Could we delay this for a point release or 2.1?" - Not a showstopper: justin, wrowe + Not a showstopper: justin, wrowe, trawick * Convert all instances of the old apr_lock_t type to the new types (once they are fully supported in APR). @@ -135,7 +136,7 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: Message-ID: <20020111115006.K1529@clove.org> Vote: Is a non-portable perchild going to hold up a GA release? Yes: - No: Aaron, Justin + No: Aaron, Justin, trawick * Modify the worker MPM so that it doesn't need to create and destroy a pool for each request--possibly by adopting a -- 2.40.0