From 384897f46bda15de011c659bb9c4253c1aed2d93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:41:35 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] isalist was less trustable than I thought (or rather, one can
 trust it to come up with all kinds of names we don't have in our targets).
 Besides, our sparcv9 targets currently generate sparcv8 code, I'm told.

---
 config | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/config b/config
index 7cfc4f9330..3e9af7680a 100755
--- a/config
+++ b/config
@@ -595,10 +595,8 @@ EOF
         fi ;;
   *-*-linux1) OUT="linux-aout" ;;
   sun4u*-*-solaris2)
-	ISA=`(isalist) 2>/dev/null`
-	ISA64=`echo $ISA | grep sparcv9`
-	ISA=`set $ISA; echo $1`
-	OUT="solaris-$ISA-$CC" ;;
+	OUT="solaris-sparcv9-$CC"
+	ISA64=`(isalist) 2>/dev/null | grep sparcv9`
 	if [ "$ISA64" != "" ]; then
 	    if [ "$CC" = "cc" -a $CCVER -ge 50 ]; then
 		echo "WARNING! If you wish to build 64-bit library, then you have to"
-- 
2.40.0