From 313a3602bb8c25b1a060bd5cfae87d546f32ccf2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrei Zmievski Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:32:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] This has been scaring people off. --- ext/overload/EXPERIMENTAL | 0 ext/overload/README | 20 +------------------- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 ext/overload/EXPERIMENTAL diff --git a/ext/overload/EXPERIMENTAL b/ext/overload/EXPERIMENTAL deleted file mode 100644 index e69de29bb2..0000000000 diff --git a/ext/overload/README b/ext/overload/README index 3ce21fb6e3..1ae3dcc557 100644 --- a/ext/overload/README +++ b/ext/overload/README @@ -1,8 +1,3 @@ -This extension is experimental. - -That's all I'm required to say, as you should know the consequences, but -I'll go ahead and add a few more notes. - The purpose of this extension is to allow user-space overloading of object property access and method calls. It has only one function, overload() which takes the name of the class that should have this functionality enabled. But @@ -93,20 +88,7 @@ var_dump($o->COUNT); ?> -What works ----------- -Whatever you can get it to do. - - What doesn't work ----------------- Invoking original overloading handlers, if the class had any. -__set() only works to one level of property access, no chains yet -Whatever else I am forgetting about here. - - -What might change ------------------ -Hell, anything, even the name of extension and its only function. - -Feedback, please. +__set() only works to one level of property access, no chains yet. -- 2.40.0