From 1630f5b92a3a00aff5674f31af1d418628a00ac7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:52:34 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Add comment about intentional fallthrough in switch.

Coverity complained about an apparent missing "break" in a switch
added by bb140506df605fab.  The human-readable comments are pretty
clear that this is intentional, but add a standard /* FALL THRU */
comment to make it clear to tools too.
---
 src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c
index fc0686ee66..3f1e7f961f 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ TS_execute_ternary(GinChkVal *gcv, QueryItem *curitem)
 			 * treat OP_PHRASE as OP_AND with recheck requirement
 			 */
 			*gcv->need_recheck = true;
+			/* FALL THRU */
 
 		case OP_AND:
 			val1 = TS_execute_ternary(gcv, curitem + curitem->qoperator.left);
-- 
2.49.0