From 0fe706040795f24ad61c0ca436a0304fdce8fd6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gabor Greif Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:46:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Tweak an expected-error to match the output. IMHO it is better to diagnose 'int (void)' because it has the same meaning in C and C++. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@57901 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- test/SemaCXX/decl-expr-ambiguity.cpp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/decl-expr-ambiguity.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/decl-expr-ambiguity.cpp index 72948e6c75..b2c3ea7b5a 100644 --- a/test/SemaCXX/decl-expr-ambiguity.cpp +++ b/test/SemaCXX/decl-expr-ambiguity.cpp @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ void f() { (int(1)); // expected-warning {{expression result unused}} // type-id - (int())1; // expected-error {{used type 'int ()' where arithmetic or pointer type is required}} + (int())1; // expected-error {{used type 'int (void)' where arithmetic or pointer type is required}} // Declarations. int fd(T(a)); // expected-warning {{parentheses were disambiguated as a function declarator}} -- 2.40.0