From 0776661d41fa312e1457b8e7cde971ab685a07f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Christopher Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:56:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] In the new pass manager use PTO.LoopUnrolling to determine when and how we will unroll loops. Also comment a few occasions where we need to know whether or not we're forcing the unwinder or not. The default before and after this patch is for LoopUnroll to be enabled, and for it to use a cost model to determine whether to unroll the loop (`OnlyWhenForced = false`). Before this patch, disabling loop unroll would not run the LoopUnroll pass. After this patch, the LoopUnroll pass is being run, but it restricts unrolling to only the loops marked by a pragma (`OnlyWhenForced = true`). In addition, this patch disables the UnrollAndJam pass when disabling unrolling. Testcase is in clang because it's controlling how the loop optimizer is being set up and there's no other way to trigger the behavior. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@374838 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- test/Misc/loop-opt-setup.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 test/Misc/loop-opt-setup.c diff --git a/test/Misc/loop-opt-setup.c b/test/Misc/loop-opt-setup.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8d3835b448 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Misc/loop-opt-setup.c @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +// RUN: %clang -O1 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -fno-unroll-loops -S -o - %s -emit-llvm | FileCheck %s +// RUN: %clang -O1 -fno-unroll-loops -S -o - %s -emit-llvm | FileCheck %s +extern int a[16]; +int b = 0; +int foo(void) { +#pragma unroll + for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) + a[i] = b += 2; + return b; +} +// CHECK-NOT: br i1 + -- 2.40.0