From 05843bbbb957e7cf874ad9679cbf95690901b117 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rich Bowen Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:44:57 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Are the per-module links to 2.2 correct? git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1030143 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- docs/STATUS | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/STATUS b/docs/STATUS index c5d1b5d6be..35d1402392 100644 --- a/docs/STATUS +++ b/docs/STATUS @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ To Do List many months of effort, due to the volume of work and the mind-numbing tediousness.) +- 1.3: Verify that the auto-generated link at the top of each module doc + goes to a valid 2.2 module - that is, find the modules that have + changed their names and in those cases hard-code the link to the + appropriate 2.2 docs (see mod_auth for example). + - Adding to the discussion of conditional logging, which I think could be turned into more of a howto than the one paragraph it's got now. -- 2.40.0