Teresa Johnson [Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:05:44 +0000 (15:05 +0000)]
[ThinLTO] Support cloning of temporary DILocation metadata
This is needed to support linking of module-level metadata as a
postpass after function importing, where we will be leaving temporary
metadata on imported instructions until the postpass metadata import.
VX-512: Fixed a bug in FP logic operation lowering
FP logic instructions are supported in DQ extension on AVX-512 target.
I use integer operations instead.
Added tests.
I also enabled FABS in this patch in order to check ANDPS.
The operations are FOR, FXOR, FAND, FANDN.
The instructions, that supported for 512-bit vector under DQ are:
VORPS/PD, VXORPS/PD, VANDPS/PD, FANDNPS/PD.
Daniel Sanders [Mon, 7 Dec 2015 14:12:44 +0000 (14:12 +0000)]
[mips][ias] Removed DSP/DSPr2 instructions from base architecture valid-xfail.s's.
Summary:
valid-xfail.s is for instructions that should be valid in the given ISA but
incorrectly fail. DSP/DSPr2 instructions are correct to fail since DSP/DSPr2 is
not enabled.
AVX-512: Fixed masked load / store instruction selection for KNL.
Patterns were missing for KNL target for <8 x i32>, <8 x float> masked load/store.
This intrinsic comes with all legal types:
<8 x float> @llvm.masked.load.v8f32(<8 x float>* %addr, i32 align, <8 x i1> %mask, <8 x float> %passThru),
but still requires lowering, because VMASKMOVPS, VMASKMOVDQU32 work with 512-bit vectors only.
All data operands should be widened to 512-bit vector.
The mask operand should be widened to v16i1 with zeroes.
Keno Fischer [Sun, 6 Dec 2015 23:05:38 +0000 (23:05 +0000)]
[Verifier] Fix !dbg validation if Scope is the Subprogram
Summary:
We are inserting both Scope and SP into the Seen map and check whether
it was already there in which case we skip the validation (the idea
being that we already checked this Subprogram before). However,
if (Scope == SP) as MDNodes, then inserting the Scope, will trigger
the Seen check causing us to incorrectly not validate this !dbg
attachment. Fix this by not performing the SP Seen check if Scope == SP
Sanjay Patel [Sun, 6 Dec 2015 18:05:12 +0000 (18:05 +0000)]
[x86] add missing maxnum/minnum tests for 256-bit vectors
Also, switch to x86-64 because once we can lower these to something
more reasonable, there will be less noise in the checks. And add
AVX runs because those will be different than SSE.
This removes the code path that generate "synchronous" (only correct at call site) CFA.
We will probably want to re-introduce it once we are capable of emitting different
.eh_frame and .debug_frame sections.
Craig Topper [Sat, 5 Dec 2015 17:34:07 +0000 (17:34 +0000)]
[Hexagon] Don't call getNumImplicitDefs and then iterate over the count. getNumImplicitDefs contains a loop so its better to just loop over the null terminated implicit def list. NFC
Keno Fischer [Sat, 5 Dec 2015 14:42:34 +0000 (14:42 +0000)]
[ASAN] Add doFinalization to reset state
Summary: If the same pass manager is used for multiple modules ASAN
complains about GlobalsMD being initialized twice. Fix this by
resetting GlobalsMD in a new doFinalization method to allow this
use case.
Different version of indexed format may use different
name uniquing schemes for static functions. Pass the
version info to the name interface so that different
schmes can be picked (for profile lookup).
David Blaikie [Sat, 5 Dec 2015 03:41:53 +0000 (03:41 +0000)]
[llvm-dwp] Add coverage for both the presence and absence of type units, and fix/remove the emission of a broken tu_index when no type units are present
Dan Gohman [Sat, 5 Dec 2015 03:03:35 +0000 (03:03 +0000)]
[WebAssembly] Implement ReverseBranchCondition, and re-enable MachineBlockPlacement
This patch introduces a codegen-only instruction currently named br_unless,
which makes it convenient to implement ReverseBranchCondition and re-enable
the MachineBlockPlacement pass. Then in a late pass, it lowers br_unless
back into br_if.
Keno Fischer [Sat, 5 Dec 2015 01:38:12 +0000 (01:38 +0000)]
[opt] Fix run-twice option for non-idempotent passes
Cloning the module was supposed to guard against the possibility
that the passes may be non-idempotent. However, for some reason
I decided to put that AFTER the passes had already run on the
module, defeating the point entirely. Fix that by moving up the
CloneModule as is done in llc.
Keno Fischer [Sat, 5 Dec 2015 01:02:53 +0000 (01:02 +0000)]
[MC] Add a test for state reset in MCMachOStreamer
This was fixed in r254751, but untestable until r254774, which
added the necessary command line flag to llc. Add a test now
to make sure this doesn't regress again.
Dan Gohman [Sat, 5 Dec 2015 00:51:40 +0000 (00:51 +0000)]
[WebAssembly] Fix scheduling dependencies in register-stackified code
Add physical register defs to instructions used from stackified
instructions to prevent them from being scheduled into the middle of
a stack sequence. This is a conservative measure which may be loosened
in the future.
Justin Bogner [Sat, 5 Dec 2015 00:39:14 +0000 (00:39 +0000)]
CodeGen: Let the BumpPtrAllocator free the elements of indexList
The indexList's nodes are all allocated on a BumpPtrAllocator, so it's
more efficient to let them be freed when it goes away, rather than
deleting them directly. This is a follow up to r254794.
Philip Reames [Sat, 5 Dec 2015 00:18:33 +0000 (00:18 +0000)]
[EarlyCSE] IsSimple vs IsVolatile naming clarification (NFC)
When the notion of target specific memory intrinsics was introduced to EarlyCSE, the commit confused the notions of volatile and simple memory access. Since I'm about to start working on this area, cleanup the naming so that patches aren't horribly confusing. Note that the actual implementation was always bailing if the load or store wasn't simple.
Reminder:
- "volatile" - C++ volatile, can't remove any memory operations, but in principal unordered
- "ordered" - imposes ordering constraints on other nearby memory operations
- "atomic" - can't be split or sheared. In LLVM terms, all "ordered" operations are also atomic so the predicate "isAtomic" is often used.
- "simple" - a load which is none of the above. These are normal loads and what most of the optimizer works with.
Philip Reames [Fri, 4 Dec 2015 23:48:19 +0000 (23:48 +0000)]
[PassManager] Ensure destructors of cached AnalysisUsage objects are run
In 254760, I introduced the usage of a BumpPtrAllocator for the AnalysisUsage instances held by the PassManger. This turns out to have been incorrect since a BumpPtrAllocator does not run the destructors of objects when deallocating memory. Since a few of our SmallVector's had grown beyond their small size, we end up with some leaked memory. We need to use a SpecificBumpPtrAllocator instead.
Philip Reames [Fri, 4 Dec 2015 23:06:33 +0000 (23:06 +0000)]
Address a memory leak in 254760
The issue appears to have been that the copy constructor of the SmallVector was being invoked and this was somehow leading to leaked memory. This patch avoids the symptom, but likely doesn't address the underlying problem. I'm still investigating the root cause, but wanted to avoid the memory leak in the mean time. Even with the underlying fix, avoiding the redundant allocation is worthwhile.
Justin Bogner [Fri, 4 Dec 2015 23:00:54 +0000 (23:00 +0000)]
CodeGen: Move the SlotIndexes BumpPtrAllocator before the list it allocates
When a `SlotIndexes` is destroyed, `ileAllocator` will currently be
destructed before `IndexList`, but all of `IndexList`'s storage has
been allocated by `ileAllocator`. This means we'll call destructors on
garbage data, which is very bad. This can be avoided by putting the
BumpPtrAllocator earlier in the class than anything it allocates.
Unfortunately, I don't know how to test this. It depends very much on
memory layout, and the only evidence I have that this is actually
happening in practice are backtraces that might be explained by this.
By inspection though, the code is obviously dangerous/wrong, and this
is the right thing to do.
I'll follow up later with a patch that calls clearAndLeakNodesUnsafely
on the list, since there isn't much point in destructing them when
they're allocated in a BPA anyway, but I figured it makes sense to
commit the correctness fix separately from that optimization.
Hans Wennborg [Fri, 4 Dec 2015 23:00:33 +0000 (23:00 +0000)]
X86: Don't emit SAHF/LAHF for 64-bit targets unless explicitly supported
These instructions are not supported by all CPUs in 64-bit mode. Emitting them
causes Chromium to crash on start-up for users with such chips.
(GCC puts these instructions behind -msahf on 64-bit for the same reason.)
This patch adds FeatureLAHFSAHF, enables it by default for 32-bit targets
and modern CPUs, and changes X86InstrInfo::copyPhysReg back to the lowering
from before r244503 when the instructions are not available.
[libFuzzer] compute base64 in-process instead of using an external lib. Since libFuzzer should not depend on anything, just re-implement base64 encoder. PR25746
Before this patch the diagnostic handler was optional. If it was not
passed, the one in the LLVMContext was used.
That is probably not a pattern we want to follow. If each area has an
optional callback, there is a sea of callbacks and it is hard to follow
which one is called.
Doing this also found cases where the callback is a nice addition, like
testing that no errors or warnings are reported.
The other option is to always use the diagnostic handler in the
LLVMContext. That has a few problems
* To implement the C API we would have to set the diag handler and then
set it back to the original value.
* Code that creates the context might be far away from code that wants
the diagnostics.
I do have a patch that implements the second option and will send that as
an RFC.
Weiming Zhao [Fri, 4 Dec 2015 22:00:47 +0000 (22:00 +0000)]
[SimplifyLibCalls] Optimization for pow(x, n) where n is some constant
Summary:
In order to avoid calling pow function we generate repeated fmul when n is a
positive or negative whole number.
For each exponent we pre-compute Addition Chains in order to minimize the no.
of fmuls.
Refer: http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/achim/addition_chain.html
We pre-compute addition chains for exponents upto 32 (which results in a max of
7 fmuls).
For eg:
4 = 2+2
5 = 2+3
6 = 3+3 and so on
Hence,
pow(x, 4.0) ==> y = fmul x, x
x = fmul y, y
ret x
For negative exponents, we simply compute the reciprocal of the final result.
Note: This transformation is only enabled under fast-math.
Patch by Mandeep Singh Grang <mgrang@codeaurora.org>
Keno Fischer [Fri, 4 Dec 2015 21:56:46 +0000 (21:56 +0000)]
[llc/opt] Add an option to run all passes twice
Summary: Lately, I have submitted a number of patches to fix bugs that
only occurred when using the same pass manager to compile multiple
modules (generally these bugs are failure to reset some persistent
state). Unfortunately I don't think there is currently a way to test
that from the command line. This adds a very simple flag to both llc
and opt, under which the tools will simply re-run their respective
pass pipelines using the same pass manager on (a clone of the same
module). Additionally, we verify that both outputs are bitwise the
same.
David Blaikie [Fri, 4 Dec 2015 21:16:42 +0000 (21:16 +0000)]
[llvm-dwp] Include the debug_line.dwo section
This probably shouldn't be generated in the .dwo file for CUs, only for
TUs, but it's in the sample .dwos (generated by clang) so dwp should
reflect that.
Arguably the DWP tool could be smart enough to know that the CUs
shouldn't need a debug_line.dwo section and skip that even when it's
legitimately generated for TUs, but that's a bit more off-book.
Sanjoy Das [Fri, 4 Dec 2015 20:34:37 +0000 (20:34 +0000)]
[OperandBundles] Allow operand-specific attributes in operand bundles
Currently `OperandBundleUse::operandsHaveAttr` computes its result
without being given a specific operand. This is problematic because it
forces us to say that, e.g., even non-pointer operands in `"deopt"`
operand bundles are `readonly`, which doesn't make sense.
This commit changes `operandsHaveAttr` to work in the context of a
specific operand, so that we can give the operand attributes that make
sense for the operands's `llvm::Type`.
Philip Reames [Fri, 4 Dec 2015 20:05:04 +0000 (20:05 +0000)]
[LegacyPassManager] Reduce memory usage for AnalysisUsage
The LegacyPassManager was storing an instance of AnalysisUsage for each instance of each pass. In practice, most instances of a single pass class share the same dependencies. We can't rely on this because passes can (and some do) have dynamic dependencies based on instance options.
We can exploit the likely commonality by uniqueing the usage information after querying the pass, but before storing it into the pass manager. This greatly reduces memory consumption by the AnalysisUsage objects. For a long pass pipeline, I measured a decrease in memory consumption for this storage of about 50%. I have not measured on the default O3 pipeline, but I suspect it will see some benefit as well since many passes are repeated (e.g. InstCombine).
Mike Aizatsky [Fri, 4 Dec 2015 18:35:37 +0000 (18:35 +0000)]
sancov -not-covered-functions.
Summary: The command prints out list of functions that were not entered.
To do this, addresses are first converted to function locations. Set
operations are used for function locations.