Lang Hames [Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:09:58 +0000 (17:09 +0000)]
XFAIL the remote small code model tests on x86. Small code model is not properly
supported, and only worked previously because we weren't really running them
out-of-process.
Matt Arsenault [Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:02:00 +0000 (17:02 +0000)]
AMDGPU: Pattern match ffbh pattern to instruction.
The hardware instruction's output on 0 is -1 rather than 32.
Eliminate a test and select to -1. This removes an extra instruction
from the compatability function with HSAIL's firstbit instruction.
Lang Hames [Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:35:55 +0000 (16:35 +0000)]
[LLI] Replace the LLI remote-JIT support with the new ORC remote-JIT components.
The new ORC remote-JITing support provides a superset of the old code's
functionality, so we can replace the old stuff. As a bonus, a couple of
previously XFAILed tests have started passing.
Alexey Bataev [Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:52:29 +0000 (11:52 +0000)]
[X86] Reduce complexity of the LEA optimization pass, by Andrey Turetsky.
In the OptimizeLEA pass keep instructions' positions in the basic block saved and use them for calculation of the distance between two instructions instead of std::distance. This reduces complexity of the pass from O(n^3) to O(n^2) and thus the compile time.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15692
Craig Topper [Mon, 11 Jan 2016 05:13:41 +0000 (05:13 +0000)]
[TableGen] Allow asm writer to use up to 3 OpInfo tables instead of 2. This allows x86 to use 56 total bits made up of a 32-bit, 16-bit, and 8-bit table. Previously we were using 64 total bits.
This saves 14K from the x86 table size. And saves space on other targets as well.
Craig Topper [Mon, 11 Jan 2016 05:13:38 +0000 (05:13 +0000)]
[TableGen] Remove unnecessary 0 terminator from an array that only existed to prevent ending an array with a comma. But that's perfectly legal and not something we need to prevent. NFC
Lang Hames [Mon, 11 Jan 2016 01:40:11 +0000 (01:40 +0000)]
[Orc] Add support for remote JITing to the ORC API.
This patch adds utilities to ORC for managing a remote JIT target. It consists
of:
1. A very primitive RPC system for making calls over a byte-stream. See
RPCChannel.h, RPCUtils.h.
2. An RPC API defined in the above system for managing memory, looking up
symbols, creating stubs, etc. on a remote target. See OrcRemoteTargetRPCAPI.h.
3. An interface for creating high-level JIT components (memory managers,
callback managers, stub managers, etc.) that operate over the RPC API. See
OrcRemoteTargetClient.h.
4. A helper class for building servers that can handle the RPC calls. See
OrcRemoteTargetServer.h.
The system is designed to work neatly with the existing ORC components and
functionality. In particular, the ORC callback API (and consequently the
CompileOnDemandLayer) is supported, enabling lazy compilation of remote code.
Assuming this doesn't trigger any builder failures, a follow-up patch will be
committed which tests these utilities by using them to replace LLI's existing
remote-JITing demo code.
Craig Topper [Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:44:56 +0000 (00:44 +0000)]
[AVX-512] Remove unused Round and Itinerary from the maskable_cmp multiclasses. They weren't used and there were extra spaces in the asm string to prepare for the concatenations of the round string that wasn't ever used.
Lang Hames [Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:59:41 +0000 (23:59 +0000)]
[RuntimeDyld] Add a notifyObjectLoaded method to RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager.
This is a more generic version of the MCJITMemoryManager::notifyObjectLoaded
method: It provides only a RuntimeDyld reference (rather than an
ExecutionEngine), and so can be used with ORC JIT stacks.
Lang Hames [Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:51:50 +0000 (18:51 +0000)]
[RuntimeDyld] Add alignment arguments to the reserveAllocationSpace method of
RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager.
The RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager::reserveAllocationSpace method is called when
object files are loaded, and gives clients a chance to pre-allocate memory for
all segments. Previously only the size of each segment (code, ro-data, rw-data)
was supplied but not the alignment. This hasn't caused any problems so far, as
most clients allocate via the MemoryBlock interface which returns page-aligned
blocks. Adding alignment arguments enables finer grained allocation while still
satisfying alignment restrictions.
Keno Fischer [Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:17:12 +0000 (18:17 +0000)]
[SectionMemoryManager] Don't just drop the RO free list
In r255760, I optimized the SectionMemoryManager to make better use
of virtual memory on platforms where the allocation granularity was
bigger than the protection granularity. As part of this, fixing up
the free list became more complicated and was moved into
`applyMemoryGroupPermissions`. Unfortunately, I forgot to actually
remove the call that drops the free list for RO memory (I did
remove the corresponding one for RX memory), defeating the whole
optimization.
NAKAMURA Takumi [Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:56:49 +0000 (15:56 +0000)]
OrcJITTests//ObjectLinkingLayerTest.cpp: Appease msc18's C2327. It seems definition of nested class would confuse the context.
llvm\unittests\ExecutionEngine\Orc\ObjectLinkingLayerTest.cpp(115) : error C2327: 'llvm::OrcExecutionTest::TM' : is not a type name, static, or enumerator
llvm\unittests\ExecutionEngine\Orc\ObjectLinkingLayerTest.cpp(115) : error C2065: 'TM' : undeclared identifier
FYI, "this->TM" was valid even before moving class SectionMemoryManagerWrapper.
Chandler Carruth [Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:40:13 +0000 (09:40 +0000)]
[ADT] Add an abstraction for embedding an integer within a pointer-like
type.
This makes it easy and safe to use a set of flags as one elmenet of
a tagged union with pointers. There is quite a bit of code that has
historically done this by casting arbitrary integers to "pointers" and
assuming that this was safe and reliable. It is neither, and has started
to rear its head by triggering safety asserts in various abstractions
like PointerLikeTypeTraits when the integers chosen are invariably poor
choices for *some* platform and *some* situation. Not to mention the
(hopefully unlikely) prospect of one of these integers actually getting
allocated!
With this, it will be straightforward to build type safe abstractions
like this without being error prone. The abstraction itself is also
remarkably simple thanks to the implicit conversion.
This use case and pattern was also independently created by the folks
working on Swift, and they're going to incrementally add any missing
functionality they find.
Chandler Carruth [Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:48:23 +0000 (08:48 +0000)]
[ADT] Add a sum type abstraction for pointer-like types.
This is a much more general and powerful form of PointerUnion. It
provides a reasonably complete sum type (from type theory) for
pointer-like types. It has several significant advantages over the
existing PointerUnion infrastructure:
1) It allows more than two pointer types to participate without awkward
nesting structures.
2) It directly exposes the tag so that it is convenient to write
switches over the possible members.
3) It can re-use the same type for multiple tag values, something that
has been worked around by either abusing PointerIntPair or defining
nonce types and doing unsafe pointer casting.
4) It supports customization of the PointerLikeTypeTraits used for
specific member types. This means it could (in theory) be used even
with types that are over-aligned on allocation to expose larger
numbers of bits to the tag.
All in all, I think it is at least complimentary to the existing
infrastructure, and a strict improvement for some use cases.
David Majnemer [Sun, 10 Jan 2016 07:13:04 +0000 (07:13 +0000)]
[JumpThreading] Don't forget to report that the IR changed
JumpThreading's runOnFunction is supposed to return true if it made any
changes. JumpThreading has a call to removeUnreachableBlocks which may
result in changes to the IR but runOnFunction didn't appropriate account
for this possibility, leading to badness.
While we are here, make sure to call LazyValueInfo::eraseBlock in
removeUnreachableBlocks; JumpThreading preserves LVI.
Joseph Tremoulet [Sun, 10 Jan 2016 04:32:03 +0000 (04:32 +0000)]
[WinEH] Fix catchpad pred verification
Summary:
The code was simply ensuring that the catchpad's pred is its catchswitch,
which was letting cases slip through where the flow edge was the unwind
edge of the catchswitch rather than one of its catch clauses.
Joseph Tremoulet [Sun, 10 Jan 2016 04:31:05 +0000 (04:31 +0000)]
[WinEH] Disallow cyclic unwinds
Summary:
Funclet-based EH personalities/tables likely can't handle these, and they
can't be generated at source, so make them officially illegal in IR as
well.
Joseph Tremoulet [Sun, 10 Jan 2016 04:30:02 +0000 (04:30 +0000)]
[WinEH] Verify consistent funclet unwind exits
Summary:
A funclet EH pad may be exited by an unwind edge, which may be a
cleanupret exiting its cleanuppad, an invoke exiting a funclet, or an
unwind out of a nested funclet transitively exiting its parent. Funclet
EH personalities require all such exceptional exits from a given funclet to
have the same unwind destination, and EH preparation / state numbering /
table generation implicitly depends on this. Formalize it as a rule of
the IR in the LangRef and verifier.
Joseph Tremoulet [Sun, 10 Jan 2016 04:28:38 +0000 (04:28 +0000)]
[WinEH] Verify unwind edges against EH pad tree
Summary:
Funclet EH personalities require a tree-like nesting among funclets
(enforced by the ParentPad linkage in the IR), and also require that
unwind edges conform to certain rules with respect to the tree:
- An unwind edge may exit 0 or more ancestor pads
- An unwind edge must enter exactly one EH pad, which must be distinct
from any exited pads
- A cleanupret's edge must exit its cleanuppad
Describe these rules in the LangRef, and enforce them in the verifier.
Lang Hames [Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:50:40 +0000 (19:50 +0000)]
[Orc][RuntimeDyld] Prevent duplicate calls to finalizeMemory on shared memory
managers.
Prior to this patch, recursive finalization (where finalization of one
RuntimeDyld instance triggers finalization of another instance on which the
first depends) could trigger memory access failures: When the inner (dependent)
RuntimeDyld instance and its memory manager are finalized, memory allocated
(but not yet relocated) by the outer instance is locked, and relocation in the
outer instance fails with a memory access error.
This patch adds a latch to the RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager base class that is
checked by a new method: RuntimeDyld::finalizeWithMemoryManagerLocking, ensuring
that shared memory managers are only finalized by the outermost RuntimeDyld
instance.
This allows ORC clients to supply the same memory manager to multiple calls to
addModuleSet. In particular it enables the use of user-supplied memory managers
with the CompileOnDemandLayer which must reuse the supplied memory manager for
each function that is lazily compiled.
Manuel Jacob [Sat, 9 Jan 2016 04:02:16 +0000 (04:02 +0000)]
[RS4GC] Update and simplify handling of Constants in findBaseDefiningValueOfVector().
Summary:
This is analogous to r256079, which removed an overly strong assertion, and
r256812, which simplified the code by replacing three conditionals by one.
Philip Reames [Sat, 9 Jan 2016 01:31:13 +0000 (01:31 +0000)]
[rs4gc] Optionally directly relocated vector of pointers
This patch teaches rewrite-statepoints-for-gc to relocate vector-of-pointers directly rather than trying to split them. This builds on the recent lowering/IR changes to allow vector typed gc.relocates.
The motivation for this is that we recently found a bug in the vector splitting code where depending on visit order, a vector might not be relocated at some safepoint. Specifically, the bug is that the splitting code wasn't updating the side tables (live vector) of other safepoints. As a result, a vector which was live at two safepoints might not be updated at one of them. However, if you happened to visit safepoints in post order over the dominator tree, everything worked correctly. Weirdly, it turns out that post order is actually an incredibly common order to visit instructions in in practice. Frustratingly, I have not managed to write a test case which actually hits this. I can only reproduce it in large IR files produced by actual applications.
Rather than continue to make this code more complicated, we can remove all of the complexity by just representing the relocation of the entire vector natively in the IR.
At the moment, the new functionality is hidden behind a flag. To use this code, you need to pass "-rs4gc-split-vector-values=0". Once I have a chance to stress test with this option and get feedback from other users, my plan is to flip the default and remove the original splitting code. I would just remove it now, but given the rareness of the bug, I figured it was better to leave it in place until the new approach has been stress tested.
Dan Liew [Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:36:22 +0000 (22:36 +0000)]
Teach the CMake build system to run lit's test suite. These can be run
directy with ``make check-lit`` and are run as part of
``make check-all``.
In principle we should run lit's testsuite before testing LLVM using lit
so that any problems with lit get discovered before testing LLVM so we
can bail out early. However this implementation (``check-all`` runs all
tests together) seemed simpler and will still report failing lit tests.
Note that the tests and the configured ``lit.site.cfg`` have to be
copied into the build directory to avoid polluting the source tree.
And expand the select into a branch structure. This later enables
jump-threading over bb in this pass.
Using the similar approach of SimplifyCFG::FoldCondBranchOnPHI(), unfold
select if the associated PHI has at least one constant. If the unfolded
select is not jump-threaded, it will be folded again in the later
optimizations.
Justin Bogner [Fri, 8 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +0000 (19:08 +0000)]
LoopInfo: Simplify ownership of Loop objects
It's strange that LoopInfo mostly owns the Loop objects, but that it
defers deleting them to the loop pass manager. Instead, change the
oddly named "updateUnloop" to "markAsRemoved" and have it queue the
Loop object for deletion. We can't delete the Loop immediately when we
remove it, since we need its pointer identity still, so we'll mark the
object as "invalid" so that clients can see what's going on.