Kurt Roeckx [Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:00:35 +0000 (15:00 +0100)]
Add RAND_DRBG_bytes
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4752)
nickthetait [Sun, 28 Jan 2018 19:15:23 +0000 (20:15 +0100)]
Create troubleshooting subsection in INSTALL file
Fixes: #5130 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5178)
Richard Levitte [Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:56:06 +0000 (14:56 +0100)]
Treat C++ flags more like C flags, and only if C++ compiler specified
C++ flags got the same config target value as C flags, but then
nothing else happened while C flags get all kinds of stuff added to
them (especially when --strict-warnings is used).
Now, C++ flags get the exact same treatment as C flags. However, this
only happens when a C++ compiler is specified, to avoid confusing
messages about added C++ flags.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5181)
Steve Linsell [Sun, 28 Jan 2018 11:01:04 +0000 (12:01 +0100)]
Update copyright year in mkerr.pl
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5166)
Richard Levitte [Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:01:44 +0000 (13:01 +0100)]
We need Unixly defaults for config targets that don't inherit a BASE
Ideally, each config target should inherit a base to get their
platform specific defaults. Unfortunately, that is currently not the
case, so we duplicate the Unixly defaults from the BASE_unix template
into the DEFAULT template.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5177)
AR (GNU compatible)
ARFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
AS (GNU Compatible)
ASFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
CC (GNU Compatible)
CFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
CXX (GNU Compatible)
CXXFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
CPP (GNU Compatible)
CPPFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
CPPDEFINES List of CPP macro definitions. Alternative for -D
CPPINCLUDES List of CPP inclusion directories. Alternative for -I
HASHBANGPERL Perl invocation to be inserted after '#!' in public
perl scripts.
LDFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
LDLIBS (GNU Compatible)
RANLIB Program to generate library archive index
RC Program to manipulate Windows resources
RCFLAGS Flags for $(RC)
RM (GNU Compatible)
Setting one of these overrides the corresponding data from our config
targets. However, flags given directly on the configuration command
line are additional, and are therefore added to the flags coming from
one of the variables above or the config target.
Fixes #2420
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5177)
Richard Levitte [Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:54:55 +0000 (13:54 +0100)]
Processing GNU-style "make variables" - separate CPP flags from C flags
C preprocessor flags get separated from C flags, which has the
advantage that we don't get loads of macro definitions and inclusion
directory specs when linking shared libraries, DSOs and programs.
This is a step to add support for "make variables" when configuring.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5177)
Benjamin Kaduk [Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:21:08 +0000 (09:21 -0600)]
Fix ssl-trace with TLS 1.3 draft-23 PSS sigalgs
The latest TLS 1.3 draft split the RSA-PSS signature schemes into
two versions that indicate the OID of the RSA key being used.
This forced us to rename the preprocessor defines for the sigalg
values, and the ssl-trace code was not adopted to match, since
it was not enabled int the default build.
Belatedly update the ssl_sigalg_tbl in the trace code to match.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5174)
Benjamin Kaduk [Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:45:08 +0000 (14:45 -0600)]
Add TLSProxy tests for signature_algorithms_cert
We don't need to send this extension in normal operation since
we are our own X.509 library, but add some test cases that force
the extension to be sent and exercise our code to process the extension.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
Benjamin Kaduk [Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:47:12 +0000 (11:47 -0600)]
Add support for the TLS 1.3 signature_algorithms_cert extension
The new extension is like signature_algorithms, but only for the
signature *on* the certificate we will present to the peer (the
old signature_algorithms extension is still used for signatures that
we *generate*, i.e., those over TLS data structures).
We do not need to generate this extension, since we are the same
implementation as our X.509 stack and can handle the same types
of signatures, but we need to be prepared to receive it, and use the received
information when selecting what certificate to present.
There is a lot of interplay between signature_algorithms_cert and
signature_algorithms, since both affect what certificate we can
use, and thus the resulting signature algorithm used for TLS messages.
So, apply signature_algorithms_cert (if present) as a filter on what
certificates we can consider when choosing a certificate+sigalg
pair.
As part of this addition, we also remove the fallback code that let
keys of type EVP_PKEY_RSA be used to generate RSA-PSS signatures -- the
new rsa_pss_pss_* and rsa_pss_rsae_* signature schemes have pulled
the key type into what is covered by the signature algorithm, so
we should not apply this sort of compatibility workaround.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
Benjamin Kaduk [Thu, 18 Jan 2018 05:21:19 +0000 (23:21 -0600)]
Update documentation for SSL_set1_sigalgs()
These functions can now take both "sig+hash" strings and
algorithm-specific identifiers like "rsa_pss_pss_sha256" that
indicate a particular entry from the TLS signature algorithm
registry.
Also clarify that only the "_list" form allows for the new-style names
(the non-"list" interfaces take sig and hasn NIDs, which cannot
access all of the new-style schemes).
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
Benjamin Kaduk [Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:55:29 +0000 (11:55 -0600)]
Propagate TLS 1.3 sigalgs through tls1_set_sigalgs()
Our historical SSL{,_CTX}_set_sigalgs() APIs take an array of
NID pairs (hash and signature), and our parser for manually
specifying unified sigalgs (that do not necessarily correspond
to an actual signature+hash pair) was transiting via (the implementation
of) this historical API. The TLS 1.3 draft-23 has introduced
signature schemes that have identical signature type and hash type,
differing only in the (RSA) public key OID, which prevents
the rsa_pss_pss_* schemes from being properly identified and
sent on the wire.
To fix the issue, parse sigalg strings directly into SIGALG_LOOKUP
objects, and pass around an array of uint16 wire protocol values
instead of NID pairs. The old interface is retained for API
compatibility but will become less and less useful with time.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
Benjamin Kaduk [Thu, 11 Jan 2018 19:39:30 +0000 (13:39 -0600)]
Add TLS 1.3 draft-23 PSS signature algorithms
We now have a split in the signature algorithms codepoint space for
whether the certificate's key is for rsaEncryption or a PSS-specific
key, which should let us get rid of some special-casing that we
previously needed to try to coax rsaEncryption keys into performing PSS.
(This will be done in a subsequent commit.)
Send the new PSS-with-PSS-specific key first in our list, so that
we prefer the new technology to the old one.
We need to update the expected certificate type in one test,
since the "RSA-PSS+SHA256" form now corresponds to a public key
of type rsaEncryption, so we should expect the server certificate
type to be just "RSA". If we want to get a server certificate
type of "RSA-PSS", we need to use a new signature algorithm
that cannot be represented as signature+hash, so add a test for that
as well.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
Christian Heimes [Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:37:59 +0000 (10:37 +0100)]
Fix signature of min/max proto getter
The getters for min and max proto version wrongly passed NULL instead of
0 as third argument to SSL_ctrl() and SSL_CTX_ctrl(). The third argument
is not used, but the error results in a compiler warning:
warning: passing argument 3 of ‘SSL_CTX_ctrl’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
int v = SSL_CTX_get_max_proto_version(self->ctx);
See https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4364
Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5128)
David Cooper [Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:27:19 +0000 (09:27 -0400)]
Add -rsigopt option to ocsp command
Add a -rsigopt option to the ocsp command that allows signature parameters to be provided for the signing of OCSP responses. The parameters that may be provided to -rsigopt are the same as may be provided to -sigopt in the ca, req, and x509 commands.
This PR also defines a OCSP_basic_sign_ctx() function, which functions in the same way as OCSP_basic_sign(), except that it accepts a EVP_MD_CTX rather than a key and digest. The OCSP_basic_sign_ctx() function is used to implement the -rsigopt option in the ocsp command.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4190)
Richard Levitte [Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:13:48 +0000 (19:13 +0100)]
Configure: ensure that a DEPEND generates the correct inclusion directory
We incorrectly assumed that explicit dependencies meant that the
source directory would be added for inclusion. However, if the
dependent file is generated, it's stored in the build directory, and
that should be used for inclusion rather than the source directory.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5153)
Richard Levitte [Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:03:37 +0000 (19:03 +0100)]
Have EVP_PKEY_asn1_find_str() work more like EVP_PKEY_asn1_find()
EVP_PKEY_asn1_find_str() would search through standard asn1 methods
first, then those added by the application, which EVP_PKEY_asn1_find()
worked the other way around. Also, EVP_PKEY_asn1_find_str() didn't
handle aliases.
This change brings EVP_PKEY_asn1_find_str() closer to EVP_PKEY_asn1_find().
Fixes #5086
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5137)
Matt Caswell [Fri, 19 Jan 2018 14:34:56 +0000 (14:34 +0000)]
Don't allow an empty Subject when creating a Certificate
Misconfiguration (e.g. an empty policy section in the config file) can
lead to an empty Subject. Since certificates should have unique Subjects
this should not be allowed.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5114)
Benjamin Kaduk [Tue, 9 Jan 2018 21:26:37 +0000 (15:26 -0600)]
enc(1): document that AEAD is not and will not be supported
Note the reasons, including streaming output issues and key/iv/nonce
management issues.
Recommend the use of cms(1) instead.
Fixes #471.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5048)
Richard Levitte [Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:22:47 +0000 (11:22 +0100)]
Create one permanent proxy socket per TLSProxy::Proxy instance
On Windows, we sometimes see a behavior with SO_REUSEADDR where there
remains lingering listening sockets on the same address and port as a
newly created one.
To avoid this scenario, we don't create a new proxy port for each new
client run. Instead, we create one proxy socket when the proxy object
is created, and close it when destroying that object.
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5095)
Richard Levitte [Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:01:44 +0000 (22:01 +0100)]
Cygwin is POSIX, don't say it isn't
More to the point, Cygwin is a POSIX API. In our library, the use of
a POSIX API is marked by defining the macro OPENSSL_SYS_UNIX.
Therefore, that macro shouldn't be undefined when building for Cygwin.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5060)
Richard Levitte [Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:54:48 +0000 (10:54 +0100)]
TLSProxy::Proxy: Don't use ReuseAddr on Windows
On Windows, we sometimes see a behavior with SO_REUSEADDR where there
remains lingering listening sockets on the same address and port as a
newly created one.
An easy solution is not to use ReuseAddr on Windows.
Thanks Bernd Edlinger for the suggestion.
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5103)
Jakub Jelen [Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:23:37 +0000 (19:23 -0500)]
doc: Bad prototypes of EVP_PKEY_CTX_new()
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4861)
Richard Levitte [Wed, 17 Jan 2018 20:27:33 +0000 (21:27 +0100)]
TLSProxy::Proxy: don't waste time redirecting STDOUT and STDERR
On Windows, it seems that doing so in a forked (pseudo-)process
sometimes affects the parent, and thereby hides all the results that
are supposed to be seen by the running test framework (the "ok" and
"not ok" lines).
It turns out that our redirection isn't necessary, as the test
framework seems to swallow it all in non-verbose mode anyway.
It's possible that we did need this at some point, but the framework
has undergone some refinement since then...
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5100)
Matt Caswell [Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:23:07 +0000 (11:23 +0000)]
Revert BN_copy() flag copy semantics change
Commit 9f9442918a changed the semantics of BN_copy() to additionally
copy the BN_FLG_CONSTTIME flag if it is set. This turns out to be
ill advised as it has unintended consequences. For example calling
BN_mod_inverse_no_branch() can sometimes return a result with the flag
set and sometimes not as a result. This can lead to later failures if we
go down code branches that do not support constant time, but check for
the presence of the flag.
The original commit was made due to an issue in BN_MOD_CTX_set(). The
original PR fixed the problem in that function, but it was changed in
review to fix it in BN_copy() instead. The solution seems to be to revert
the BN_copy() change and go back to the originally proposed way.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5080)
Since do_rand_drbg_init() allocates three locks, it needs to ensure
that OPENSSL_init_crypto() is called, otherwise these resources are
not cleaned up properly.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5083)
Richard Levitte [Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:40:24 +0000 (10:40 +0100)]
Fix intermittent Windows and Cygwin failures in s_server
The same kind of failure that has already been observed on the
s_client can sometimes also be observed on s_server, so we need to add
the same kind of 50ms delay as was previously added on s_client.
Richard Levitte [Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:15:32 +0000 (17:15 +0100)]
Fix intermittent Cygwin failures in s_client
This was identified for Windows almost two years ago for VC and
msys/mingw. It seems that Cygwin suffers from the same issue, and
since Cygwin doesn't define OPENSSL_SYS_WINDOWS, we need to make a
special case to have a 50ms pause before closing the TLS connection.
Matt Caswell [Fri, 5 Jan 2018 10:12:29 +0000 (10:12 +0000)]
Tolerate DTLS alerts with an incorrect version number
In the case of a protocol version alert being sent by a peer the record
version number may not be what we are expecting. In DTLS records with an
unexpected version number are silently discarded. This probably isn't
appropriate for alerts, so we tolerate a mismatch in the minor version
number.
This resolves an issue reported on openssl-users where an OpenSSL server
chose DTLS1.0 but the client was DTLS1.2 only and sent a protocol_version
alert with a 1.2 record number. This was silently ignored by the server.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5018)