Richard Smith [Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:16:42 +0000 (01:16 +0000)]
Reject 'template<typename...Ts> void f(Ts ...(x));'. Add a special-case
diagnostic and a fix-it to explain to the user where the ellipsis is
supposed to go.
[arcmt] Fix a bug where a property in a class extension, that did not exist
in the interface, got its attribute rewritten twice, resulting in
'weakweak' or 'strongstrong'.
John McCall [Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:30:44 +0000 (23:30 +0000)]
When we can't prove that the target of an aggregate copy is
a complete object, the memcpy needs to use the data size of
the structure instead of its sizeof() value. Fixes PR12204.
Douglas Gregor [Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:01:27 +0000 (16:01 +0000)]
Unify and fix our checking of C++ [dcl.meaning]p1's requirements
concerning qualified declarator-ids. We now diagnose extraneous
qualification at namespace scope (which we had previously missed) and
diagnose these qualification errors for all kinds of declarations; it
was rather uneven before. Fixes <rdar://problem/11135644>.
Douglas Gregor [Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:34:23 +0000 (14:34 +0000)]
When we form a new function/class template specialization, we first
search for the specialization (in a folding set) and, if not found
form a *Decl that is then inserted into that folding set. In rare
cases, the folding set may be reallocated between the search and the
insertion, causing a crash. No test case, because triggering rehashing
consistently in a small test case is not feasible. Fixes
<rdar://problem/11115071>.
[libclang] For clang_saveTranslationUnit, if the AST to save has invalid nodes
due to compiler errors, use a crash recovery thread to do the AST writing for
protection.
Chandler Carruth [Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:58:37 +0000 (23:58 +0000)]
Move the emission of strict enum range metadata behind a flag (the same
flag as GCC uses: -fstrict-enums). There is a *lot* of code making
unwarranted assumptions about the underlying type of enums, and it
doesn't seem entirely reasonable to eagerly break all of it.
Much more importantly, the current state of affairs is *very* good at
optimizing based upon this information, which causes failures that are
very distant from the actual enum. Before we push for enabling this by
default, I think we need to implement -fcatch-undefined-behavior support
for instrumenting and trapping whenever we store or load a value outside
of the range. That way we can track down the misbehaving code very
quickly.
I discussed this with Rafael, and currently the only important cases he
is aware of are the bool range-based optimizations which are staying
hard enabled. We've not seen any issue with those either, and they are
much more important for performance.
Douglas Gregor [Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:34:16 +0000 (23:34 +0000)]
Introduce a new libclang API to determine the parent context of a code
completion item. For example, if the code completion itself represents
a declaration in a namespace (say, std::vector), then this API
retrieves the cursor kind and name of the namespace (std). Implements
<rdar://problem/11121951>.
Richard Smith [Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:05:05 +0000 (23:05 +0000)]
If we see '(...' where we're expecting an abstract-declarator, that doesn't
necessarily mean we've found a function declarator. If the next token is not
a ')', this is actually a parenthesized pack expansion.
Anna Zaks [Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:02:53 +0000 (20:02 +0000)]
[analyzer] Add an option to re-analyze a dead-end path without inlining.
The analyzer gives up path exploration under certain conditions. For
example, when the same basic block has been visited more than 4 times.
With inlining turned on, this could lead to decrease in code coverage.
Specifically, if we give up inside the inlined function, the rest of
parent's basic blocks will not get analyzed.
This commit introduces an option to enable re-run along the failed path,
in which we do not inline the last inlined call site. This is done by
enqueueing the node before the processing of the inlined call site
with a special policy encoded in the state. The policy tells us not to
inline the call site along the path.
This lead to ~10% increase in the number of paths analyzed. Even though
we expected a much greater coverage improvement.
[preprocessor] Handle correctly inclusion directives that have macro expansions, e.g
"#include MACRO(STUFF)".
-As an inclusion position for the included file, use the file location of the file where it
was included but *after* the macro expansions. We want the macro expansions to be considered
as before-in-translation-unit for everything in the included file.
-In the preprocessing record take into account that only inclusion directives can be encountered
as "out-of-order" (by comparing the start of the range which for inclusions is the hash location)
and use binary search if there is an extreme number of macro expansions in the include directive.
Douglas Gregor [Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:06:49 +0000 (18:06 +0000)]
Introduce a -cc1-level option -pubnames-dump, which simply dumps the
list of identifiers that that 'public' names at the end of the
translation unit, e.g., defined macros or identifiers with top-level
names, in sorted order. Meant to support <rdar://problem/10921596>.
John McCall [Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:42:12 +0000 (07:42 +0000)]
Update the ARC specification for several changes made in the
last N months. This required a brief soliloquy about change in
an uncertainly-versioned world.
I believe I've gotten the right target versions on all these changes.
Richard Smith [Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:42:32 +0000 (01:42 +0000)]
Add cross-referencing comments to ParseDirectDeclarator to note that
isConstructorDeclaration also needs updating for any extension to the
grammar of a direct-declarator.
Ted Kremenek [Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:12:45 +0000 (01:12 +0000)]
Change RetainCountChecker to eagerly "escape" retained objects when they are
assigned to a struct. This is fallout from inlining results, which expose
far more patterns where people stuff CF objects into structs and pass them
around (and we can reason about it). The problem is that we don't have
a general way to detect when values have escaped, so as an intermediate step
we need to eagerly prune out such tracking.
Richard Smith [Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:56:56 +0000 (00:56 +0000)]
When we see 'Class(X' or 'Class::Class(X' and we suspect that it names a
constructor, but X is not a known typename, check whether the tokens could
possibly match the syntax of a declarator before concluding that it isn't
a constructor. If it's definitely ill-formed, assume it is a constructor.
Empirical evidence suggests that this pattern is much more often a
constructor with a typoed (or not-yet-declared) type name than any of the
other possibilities, so the extra cost of the check is not expected to be
problematic.
Richard Smith [Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:31:41 +0000 (20:31 +0000)]
Forward-declared enumerations are now complete, except for an interaction
between unscoped enumerations and class template member specializations,
whose behavior is currently under discussion in CWG (and for which there
is a preference to not implement the currently-standardized wording).
Richard Smith [Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:28:16 +0000 (20:28 +0000)]
Add a special-case diagnostic for one of the more obnoxious special cases of
unscoped enumeration members: an enumerator name which is visible in the
out-of-class definition of a member of a templated class might not actually
exist in the instantiation of that class, if the enumeration is also lexically
defined outside the class definition and is explicitly specialized.
Depending on the result of a CWG discussion, we may have a different resolution
for a class of problems in this area, but this fixes the immediate issue of a
crash-on-invalid / accepts-invalid (depending on +Asserts). Thanks to Johannes
Schaub for digging into the standard wording to find how this case is currently
specified to behave.
Benjamin Kramer [Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:57:36 +0000 (16:57 +0000)]
Move CodeCompletionBuilder's chunk adding methods out of line.
This makes sense because chunk's ctor is also out of line and simplifies considerably
when inlined with a constant parameter. Shrinks clang on i386-linux-Release+Asserts by 65k.
Douglas Gregor [Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:54:18 +0000 (16:54 +0000)]
When diagnosing an invalid out-of-line redeclaration, don't permit
typo correction to introduce a nested-name-specifier; we aren't
prepared to handle it here. Fixes PR12297 / <rdar://problem/11075219>.
Douglas Gregor [Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:52:37 +0000 (15:52 +0000)]
Canonicalize the declaration we write to a PCH file for an
InjectedClassNameType; otherwise, it won't be properly wired to the
original (canonical) declaration when it is deserialized. Fixes
<rdar://problem/11112464>.
Benjamin Kramer [Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:39:31 +0000 (15:39 +0000)]
Driver: Factor string vector push_back into a helper class and optimize it.
Due to lack of move semantics we would create a temporary std::string from the
string literal, copy it into the vector and discard the temporary. This leads
to massive code bloat, optimizing it saves 50k on i386-linux-Release+Asserts.
While there add a two-element overload for push_back, simplifying code a bit.
Richard Smith [Mon, 26 Mar 2012 04:58:10 +0000 (04:58 +0000)]
Handle instantiations of redeclarations of forward-declared enumerations within
templated functions. Build a redeclaration chain, and only instantiate the
definition of the enum when visiting the defining declaration.
Jordy Rose [Sat, 24 Mar 2012 03:03:29 +0000 (03:03 +0000)]
[analyzer] Restart path diagnostic generation if any of the visitors change the report configuration while walking the path.
This required adding a change count token to BugReport, but also allowed us to ditch ImmutableList as the BugReporterVisitor data type.
Also, remove the hack from MallocChecker, now that visitors appear in the opposite order. This is not exactly a fix, but the common case -- custom diagnostics after generic ones -- is now the default behavior.
[parser] If there are unmatched braces in a function definition, try to
recover by returning the statements that we parsed so far, instead of
dropping the whole function body.
projects / clang / log