Joel E. Denny [Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:03:19 +0000 (00:03 +0000)]
[FileCheck] Annotate input dump (6/7)
This patch implements input annotations for diagnostics reporting
CHECK-DAG discarded matches. These diagnostics are enabled by -vv.
These annotations mark discarded match ranges using `!~~` because they
are bad matches even though they are not errors.
CHECK-DAG discarded matches create another case where there can be
multiple match results for the same directive.
For example:
```
$ FileCheck -dump-input=help
The following description was requested by -dump-input=help to
explain the input annotations printed by -dump-input=always and
-dump-input=fail:
- L: labels line number L of the input file
- T:L labels the only match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
the check file
- T:L'N labels the Nth match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
the check file
- ^~~ marks good match (reported if -v)
- !~~ marks bad match, such as:
- CHECK-NEXT on same line as previous match (error)
- CHECK-NOT found (error)
- CHECK-DAG overlapping match (discarded, reported if -vv)
- X~~ marks search range when no match is found, such as:
- CHECK-NEXT not found (error)
- CHECK-DAG not found after discarded matches (error)
- ? marks fuzzy match when no match is found
- colors success, error, fuzzy match, discarded match, unmatched input
If you are not seeing color above or in input dumps, try: -color
$ FileCheck -vv -dump-input=always check4 < input4 |& sed -n '/^<<<</,$p'
<<<<<<
1: abcdef
dag:1 ^~~~
dag:2'0 !~~~ discard: overlaps earlier match
2: cdefgh
dag:2'1 ^~~~
check:3 X~ error: no match found
>>>>>>
This shows that the line 3 CHECK fails to match even though its
pattern appears in the input because its search range starts after the
line 2 CHECK-DAG's match range. The trouble might be that the line 2
CHECK-DAG's match range is later than expected because its first match
range overlaps with the line 1 CHECK-DAG match range and thus is
discarded.
Because `!~~` for CHECK-DAG does not indicate an error, it is not
colored red. Instead, when colors are enabled, it is colored cyan,
which suggests a match that went cold.
Joel E. Denny [Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:03:03 +0000 (00:03 +0000)]
[FileCheck] Annotate input dump (5/7)
This patch implements input annotations for diagnostics enabled by -v,
which report good matches for directives. These annotations mark
match ranges using `^~~`.
For example:
```
$ FileCheck -dump-input=help
The following description was requested by -dump-input=help to
explain the input annotations printed by -dump-input=always and
-dump-input=fail:
- L: labels line number L of the input file
- T:L labels the only match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
the check file
- T:L'N labels the Nth match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
the check file
- ^~~ marks good match (reported if -v)
- !~~ marks bad match, such as:
- CHECK-NEXT on same line as previous match (error)
- CHECK-NOT found (error)
- X~~ marks search range when no match is found, such as:
- CHECK-NEXT not found (error)
- ? marks fuzzy match when no match is found
- colors success, error, fuzzy match, unmatched input
If you are not seeing color above or in input dumps, try: -color
$ FileCheck -v -dump-input=always check3 < input3 |& sed -n '/^<<<</,$p'
<<<<<<
1: abc foobar def
check:1 ^~~
not:2 !~~~~~ error: no match expected
check:3 ^~~
>>>>>>
-vv enables these annotations for FileCheck's implicit EOF patterns as
well. For an example where EOF patterns become relevant, see patch 7
in this series.
If colors are enabled, `^~~` is green to suggest success.
-v plus color enables highlighting of input text that has no final
match for any expected pattern. The highlight uses a cyan background
to suggest a cold section. This highlighting can make it easier to
spot text that was intended to be matched but that failed to be
matched in a long series of good matches.
CHECK-COUNT-<num> good matches are another case where there can be
multiple match results for the same directive.
Joel E. Denny [Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:02:47 +0000 (00:02 +0000)]
[FileCheck] Annotate input dump (4/7)
This patch implements input annotations for diagnostics that report
unexpected matches for CHECK-NOT. Like wrong-line matches for
CHECK-NEXT, CHECK-SAME, and CHECK-EMPTY, these annotations mark match
ranges using red `!~~` to indicate bad matches that are errors.
For example:
```
$ FileCheck -dump-input=help
The following description was requested by -dump-input=help to
explain the input annotations printed by -dump-input=always and
-dump-input=fail:
- L: labels line number L of the input file
- T:L labels the only match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
the check file
- T:L'N labels the Nth match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
the check file
- !~~ marks bad match, such as:
- CHECK-NEXT on same line as previous match (error)
- CHECK-NOT found (error)
- X~~ marks search range when no match is found, such as:
- CHECK-NEXT not found (error)
- ? marks fuzzy match when no match is found
- colors error, fuzzy match
If you are not seeing color above or in input dumps, try: -color
$ FileCheck -v -dump-input=always check3 < input3 |& sed -n '/^<<<</,$p'
<<<<<<
1: abc foobar def
not:2 !~~~~~ error: no match expected
>>>>>>
Joel E. Denny [Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:02:22 +0000 (00:02 +0000)]
[FileCheck] Annotate input dump (3/7)
This patch implements input annotations for diagnostics that report
wrong-line matches for the directives CHECK-NEXT, CHECK-SAME, and
CHECK-EMPTY. Instead of the usual `^~~`, which is used by later
patches for good matches, these annotations use `!~~` to mark the bad
match ranges so that this category of errors is visually distinct.
Because such matches are errors, these annotates are red when colors
are enabled.
For example:
```
$ FileCheck -dump-input=help
The following description was requested by -dump-input=help to
explain the input annotations printed by -dump-input=always and
-dump-input=fail:
- L: labels line number L of the input file
- T:L labels the only match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
the check file
- T:L'N labels the Nth match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
the check file
- !~~ marks bad match, such as:
- CHECK-NEXT on same line as previous match (error)
- X~~ marks search range when no match is found, such as:
- CHECK-NEXT not found (error)
- ? marks fuzzy match when no match is found
- colors error, fuzzy match
If you are not seeing color above or in input dumps, try: -color
$ FileCheck -v -dump-input=always check2 < input2 |& sed -n '/^<<<</,$p'
<<<<<<
1: foo bar
next:2 !~~ error: match on wrong line
>>>>>>
Joel E. Denny [Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:02:04 +0000 (00:02 +0000)]
[FileCheck] Annotate input dump (2/7)
This patch implements input annotations for diagnostics that suggest
fuzzy matches for directives for which no matches were found. Instead
of using the usual `^~~`, which is used by later patches for good
matches, these annotations use `?` so that fuzzy matches are visually
distinct. No tildes are included as these diagnostics (independently
of this patch) currently identify only the start of the match.
For example:
```
$ FileCheck -dump-input=help
The following description was requested by -dump-input=help to
explain the input annotations printed by -dump-input=always and
-dump-input=fail:
- L: labels line number L of the input file
- T:L labels the only match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
the check file
- T:L'N labels the Nth match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
the check file
- X~~ marks search range when no match is found
- ? marks fuzzy match when no match is found
- colors error, fuzzy match
If you are not seeing color above or in input dumps, try: -color
$ FileCheck -v -dump-input=always check1 < input1 |& sed -n '/^<<<</,$p'
<<<<<<
1: ; abc def
2: ; ghI jkl
next:3'0 X~~~~~~~~ error: no match found
next:3'1 ? possible intended match
>>>>>>
This patch introduces the concept of multiple "match results" per
directive. In the above example, the first match result for the
CHECK-NEXT directive is the failed match, for which the annotation
shows the search range. The second match result is the fuzzy match.
Later patches will introduce other cases of multiple match results per
directive.
When colors are enabled, `?` is colored magenta. That is, it doesn't
indicate the actual error, which a red `X~~` marker indicates, but its
color suggests it's closely related.
Joel E. Denny [Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:01:39 +0000 (00:01 +0000)]
[FileCheck] Annotate input dump (1/7)
Extend FileCheck to dump its input annotated with FileCheck's
diagnostics: errors, good matches if -v, and additional information if
-vv. The goal is to make it easier to visualize FileCheck's matching
behavior when debugging.
Each patch in this series implements input annotations for a
particular category of FileCheck diagnostics. While the first few
patches alone are somewhat useful, the annotations become much more
useful as later patches implement annotations for -v and -vv
diagnostics, which show the matching behavior leading up to the error.
This first patch implements boilerplate plus input annotations for
error diagnostics reporting that no matches were found for a
directive. These annotations mark the search ranges of the failed
directives. Instead of using the usual `^~~`, which is used by later
patches for good matches, these annotations use `X~~` so that this
category of errors is visually distinct.
For example:
```
$ FileCheck -dump-input=help
The following description was requested by -dump-input=help to
explain the input annotations printed by -dump-input=always and
-dump-input=fail:
- L: labels line number L of the input file
- T:L labels the match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
the check file
- X~~ marks search range when no match is found
- colors error
If you are not seeing color above or in input dumps, try: -color
Some additional details related to the boilerplate:
* Enabling: The annotated input dump is enabled by `-dump-input`,
which can also be set via the `FILECHECK_OPTS` environment variable.
Accepted values are `help`, `always`, `fail`, or `never`. As shown
above, `help` describes the format of the dump. `always` is helpful
when you want to investigate a successful FileCheck run, perhaps for
an unexpected pass. `-dump-input-on-failure` and
`FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE` remain as a deprecated alias for
`-dump-input=fail`.
* Diagnostics: The usual diagnostics are not suppressed in this mode
and are printed first. For brevity in the example above, I've
omitted them using a sed command. Sometimes they're perfectly
sufficient, and then they make debugging quicker than if you were
forced to hunt through a dump of long input looking for the error.
If you think they'll get in the way sometimes, keep in mind that
it's pretty easy to grep for the start of the input dump, which is
`<<<`.
* Colored Annotations: The annotated input is colored if colors are
enabled (enabling colors can be forced using -color). For example,
errors are red. However, as in the above example, colors are not
vital to reading the annotations.
I don't know how to test color in the output, so any hints here would
be appreciated.
Summary:
We use `variable_ops` in the tablegen defs to denote the list of
branch targets in `br_table`, but unlike other uses of `variable_ops`
(e.g. call) the these branch targets need to actually be encoded in the
instruction. The existing tables for `variable_ops` cause not operands
to be accepted by the assembly matcher.
Following the example of ARM:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/2cc0a7da876c1d8c32775b0119e1e15aaa759b9e/lib/Target/ARM/ARMInstrInfo.td#L550-L555
we introduce a new operand type to capture this list, and we use the
same {} syntax as ARM as well to differentiate them from regular
integer operands.
Also removed definition and use of TSFlags in tablegen defs, since
`br_table` now has a non-variable_ops immediate operand, so the
previous logic of only the variable_ops arguments being labels didn't
make sense anymore.
Sanjay Patel [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 21:14:51 +0000 (21:14 +0000)]
[AggressiveInstCombine] convert rotate with guard branch into funnel shift (PR34924)
Now, that we have funnel shift intrinsics, it should be safe to convert this form of rotate to it.
In the worst case (a target that doesn't have rotate instructions), we will expand this into a
branch-less sequence of ALU ops (neg/and/and/lshr/shl/or) in the backend, so it's still very
likely to be a perf improvement over the original code.
The motivating source code pattern for this is shown in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34924
Background:
I looked at several different options before deciding where to try this - instcombine, simplifycfg,
CGP - because it doesn't fit cleanly anywhere AFAIK.
The backend (CGP, SDAG, GlobalIsel?) is too late for what we're trying to accomplish. We want to
have the IR converted before we reach things like vectorization because the reduced code can make a
loop much simpler to transform.
Technically, this could be included in instcombine, but it's a large pattern match that includes
control-flow, so it just felt wrong to stuff into there (although I have a draft of that patch).
Similarly, this could be part of simplifycfg, but all of this pattern matching is a stretch.
So we're left with our relatively new dumping ground for homeless transforms: aggressive-instcombine.
This only runs at -O3, but that seems like a reasonable limitation given that source code has many
options to avoid this pattern (including the recently added clang intrinsics for rotates).
I'm including a PhaseOrdering test because we require the teamwork of 3 passes (aggressive-instcombine,
instcombine, simplifycfg) to get this into the minimal IR form that we want. That test shows a bug
with the new pass manager that's independent of this change (but it will be masked if we canonicalize
harder to funnel shift intrinsics in instcombine).
Craig Topper [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:29:13 +0000 (20:29 +0000)]
[SelectionDAG] Fix noop detection for vectors in AssertZext/AssertSext in getNode
The assertion type is always supposed to be a scalar type. So if the result VT of the assertion is a vector, we need to get the scalar VT before we can compare them.
Similarly for the assert above it.
I don't have a test case because I don't know of any place we violate this today. A coworker found this while trying to use r347287 on the 6.0 branch without also having r336868
Sanjay Patel [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:27:43 +0000 (20:27 +0000)]
[InstCombine] don't widen an arbitrary sequence of vector ops (PR40032)
The problem is shown specifically for a case with vector multiply here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40032
...and this might mask the original backend bug for ARM shown in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39967
As the test diffs here show, we were (and probably still aren't) doing
these kinds of transforms in a principled way. We are producing more or
equal wide instructions than we started with in some cases, so we still
need to restrict/correct other transforms from overstepping.
If there are perf regressions from this change, we can either carve out
exceptions to the general IR rules, or improve the backend to do these
transforms when we know the transform is profitable. That's probably
similar to a change like D55448.
Craig Topper [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:02:16 +0000 (20:02 +0000)]
Convert (CMP (srl/shl X, C), 0) to (CMP (and X, C'), 0) when only the zero flag is used.
This allows a TEST to be used and can be combined with any AND that may already exist as an input to the shift.
This was already done in EmitTest, but was easily tricked by multiple uses because the setcc might be used by multiple instructions. Once the SETCC and users are legalized then we can look for the shift to be used by a single CMP, but the CMP itself can have multiple users.
JF Bastien [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 18:54:22 +0000 (18:54 +0000)]
AsmParser: test .double NaN and .double inf
Summary: It looks like this support was added to match GNU AS, but only tests
.float and not .double. I asked RedHat folks to confirm that 0x7fffffffffffffff
was indeed the right value for NaN.
Same for infinity, but it only has positive / negative encodings.
Simon Pilgrim [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 18:43:43 +0000 (18:43 +0000)]
[TargetLowering] Add DemandedElts mask to SimplifyDemandedBits (PR40000)
This is an initial patch to add the necessary support for a DemandedElts argument to SimplifyDemandedBits, more closely matching computeKnownBits and to help improve vector codegen.
I've added only a small amount of the changes necessary to get at least one test to update - a lot more can be done but I'd like to add these methodically with proper test coverage, at the same time the hope is to slowly move some/all of SimplifyDemandedVectorElts into SimplifyDemandedBits as well.
Nikita Popov [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:45:18 +0000 (17:45 +0000)]
[InstSimplify] Simplify saturating add/sub + icmp
If a saturating add/sub has one constant operand, then we can
determine the possible range of outputs it can produce, and simplify
an icmp comparison based on that.
The implementation is based on a similar existing mechanism for
simplifying binary operator + icmps.
Tim Northover [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:25:53 +0000 (17:25 +0000)]
FastIsel: take care to update iterators when removing instructions.
We keep a few iterators into the basic block we're selecting while
performing FastISel. Usually this is fine, but occasionally code wants
to remove already-emitted instructions. When this happens we have to be
careful to update those iterators so they're not pointint at dangling
memory.
Tim Northover [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:05:32 +0000 (15:05 +0000)]
ARM: use acquire/release instruction variants when available.
These features (fairly) recently got split out into their own feature, so we
should make CodeGen use them when available. The main change here is that the
check used to be based on the triple, but now it's based on CPU features.
Andrea Di Biagio [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:00:37 +0000 (14:00 +0000)]
[MCA] Don't assume that createMCInstrAnalysis() always returns a valid pointer.
Class InstrBuilder wrongly assumed that llvm targets were always able to return
a non-null pointer when createMCInstrAnalysis() was called on them.
This was causing crashes when simulating executions for targets that don't
provide an MCInstrAnalysis object.
This patch fixes the issue by making MCInstrAnalysis optional.
[AArch64] Re-run load/store optimizer after aggressive tail duplication
The Load/Store Optimizer runs before Machine Block Placement. At O3 the
Tail Duplication Threshold is set to 4 instructions and this can create
new opportunities for the Load/Store Optimizer. It seems worthwhile to
run it once again.
David Blaikie [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 08:27:19 +0000 (08:27 +0000)]
DebugInfo: Assume an absence of ranges or high_pc on a CU means the CU is empty (devoid of code addresses)
GCC emitted these unconditionally on/before 4.4/March 2012
Clang emitted these unconditionally on/before 3.5/March 2014
This improves performance when parsing CUs (especially those using split
DWARF) that contain no code ranges (such as the mini CUs that may be
created by ThinLTO importing - though generally they should be/are
avoided, especially for Split DWARF because it produces a lot of very
small CUs, which don't scale well in a bunch of other ways too
(including size)).
Kewen Lin [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 03:16:12 +0000 (03:16 +0000)]
[Power9][NFC]Make pre-inc-disable case more robust
With some patch adopted for Power9 vabsd* insns, some CHECKs can't get the expected results.
But it's false alarm, we should update the case more robust.
Craig Topper [Sun, 16 Dec 2018 18:35:55 +0000 (18:35 +0000)]
[X86] Remove truncation handling from EmitTest. Replace it with a DAG combine.
I'd like to try to move a lot of the flag matching out of EmitTest and push it to isel or isel preprocessing. This is a step towards that.
The test-shrink-bug.ll changie is an improvement because we are no longer interfering with test shrink handling in isel.
The pr34137.ll change is a regression, but the IR came from -O0 and was not reduced by InstCombine. So it contains a lot of redundancies like duplicate loads that made it combine poorly.
Sanjay Patel [Sun, 16 Dec 2018 15:05:48 +0000 (15:05 +0000)]
[x86] increment/decrement constant vector with min/max in vsetcc lowering (PR39859)
This is part of fixing PR39859:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39859
We have a crippled vector ISA, so we have to invert a typical fold and create min/max here.
As discussed in the bug report, we can probably do better by using saturating subtract when
it's available, but we should have this improvement for the min/max patterns regardless.
Sanjay Patel [Sun, 16 Dec 2018 14:57:04 +0000 (14:57 +0000)]
[DAGCombiner] allow hoisting vector bitwise logic ahead of truncates
The transform performs a bitwise logic op in a wider type followed by
truncate when both inputs are truncated from the same source type:
logic_op (truncate x), (truncate y) --> truncate (logic_op x, y)
There are a bunch of other checks that should prevent doing this when
it might be harmful.
We already do this transform for scalars in this spot. The vector
limitation was shared with a check for the case when the operands are
extended. I'm not sure if that limit is needed either, but that would
be a separate patch.
Simon Pilgrim [Sun, 16 Dec 2018 13:33:37 +0000 (13:33 +0000)]
[SelectionDAG] Add FSHL/FSHR support to computeKnownBits
Also exposes an issue in DAGCombiner::visitFunnelShift where we were assuming the shift amount had the result type (after legalization it'll have the targets shift amount type).
Simon Pilgrim [Sat, 15 Dec 2018 19:43:44 +0000 (19:43 +0000)]
[X86] Lower to SHLD/SHRD on slow machines for optsize
Use consistent rules for when to lower to SHLD/SHRD for slow machines - fixes a weird issue where funnel shift gets expanded but then X86ISelLowering's combineOr sees the optsize and combines to SHLD/SHRD, but now with the modulo amount guard......
Summary:
Make machine PHIs optimization to work for single value register taken from
several different copies. This is the first step to fix PR38917. This change
allows to get rid of redundant PHIs (see opt_phis2.mir test) to make
the subsequent optimizations (like CSE) possible and simpler.
For instance, before this patch the code like this:
%b = COPY %z
...
%a = PHI %bb1, %a; %bb2, %b
could be optimized to:
%a = %b
but the code like this:
%c = COPY %z
...
%b = COPY %z
...
%a = PHI %bb1, %a; %bb2, %b; %bb3, %c
would remain unchanged.
With this patch the latter case will be optimized:
%a = %z```.
Committed on behalf of: Anton Afanasyev anton.a.afanasyev@gmail.com
Nikita Popov [Sat, 15 Dec 2018 10:37:01 +0000 (10:37 +0000)]
[InstSimplify] Add tests for saturating add/sub + icmp; NFC
If a saturating add/sub with a constant operand is compared to
another constant, we should be able to determine that the condition
is always true/false in some cases (but currently don't).
Florian Hahn [Sat, 15 Dec 2018 01:32:58 +0000 (01:32 +0000)]
[SILoadStoreOptimizer] Use std::abs to avoid truncation.
Using regular abs() causes the following warning
error: absolute value function 'abs' given an argument of type 'int64_t' (aka 'long') but has parameter of type 'int' which may cause truncation of value [-Werror,-Wabsolute-value]
(uint32_t)abs(Dist) > MaxDist) {
^
lib/Target/AMDGPU/SILoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:1369:19: note: use function 'std::abs' instead
which causes a bot to fail:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/18284/steps/bootstrap%20clang/logs/stdio
Craig Topper [Sat, 15 Dec 2018 01:07:19 +0000 (01:07 +0000)]
[X86] Rename hasNoSignedComparisonUses to hasNoSignFlagUses. Add the instruction that only modify the O flag to the waiver list.
The only caller of this turns CMP with 0 into TEST. CMP with 0 and TEST both set OF to 0 so we should have no issues with instructions that only use OF.
Though I don't think there's any reason we would read just OF after a compare with 0 anyway. So this probably isn't an observable change.
Craig Topper [Sat, 15 Dec 2018 01:07:16 +0000 (01:07 +0000)]
[X86] Make hasNoCarryFlagUses/hasNoSignedComparisonUses take an SDValue that indicates which result is the flag result. NFCI
hasNoCarryFlagUses hardcoded that the flag result is 1 and used that to filter which uses were of interest. hasNoSignedComparisonUses just assumes the only result is flags and checks whether any user of the node is a CopyToReg instruction.
After this patch we now do a result number check in both and rely on the caller to provide the result number.
This shouldn't change behavior it was just an odd difference between the two functions that I noticed.
Heejin Ahn [Sat, 15 Dec 2018 00:58:12 +0000 (00:58 +0000)]
[WebAssembly] Check if the section order is correct
Summary:
This patch checks if the section order is correct when reading a wasm
object file in `WasmObjectFile` and converting YAML to wasm object in
yaml2wasm. (It is not possible to check when reading YAML because it is
handled exclusively by the YAML reader.)
This checks the ordering of all known sections (core sections + known
custom sections). This also adds section ID DataCount section that will
be scheduled to be added in near future.
Florian Hahn [Sat, 15 Dec 2018 00:32:38 +0000 (00:32 +0000)]
[NewGVN] Update use counts for SSA copies when replacing them by their operands.
The current code relies on LeaderUseCount to determine if we can remove
an SSA copy, but in that the LeaderUseCount does not refer to the SSA
copy. If a SSA copy is a dominating leader, we use the operand as dominating
leader instead. This means we removed a user of a ssa copy and we should
decrement its use count, so we can remove the ssa copy once it becomes dead.
Vedant Kumar [Sat, 15 Dec 2018 00:03:33 +0000 (00:03 +0000)]
[Util] Refer to [s|z]exts of args when converting dbg.declares (fix PR35400)
When converting dbg.declares, if the described value is a [s|z]ext,
refer to the ext directly instead of referring to its operand.
This fixes a narrowing bug (the debugger got the sign of a variable
wrong, see llvm.org/PR35400).
The main reason to refer to the ext's operand was that an optimization
may remove the ext itself, leading to a dropped variable. Now that
InstCombine has been taught to use replaceAllDbgUsesWith (r336451), this
is less of a concern. Other passes can/should adopt this API as needed
to fix dropped variable bugs.
Artem Belevich [Fri, 14 Dec 2018 23:53:06 +0000 (23:53 +0000)]
[NVPTX] Lower instructions that expand into libcalls.
The change is an effort to split and refactor abandoned
D34708 into smaller parts.
Here the behaviour of unsupported instructions is changed
to match the behaviour of explicit intrinsics calls.
Currently LLVM crashes with:
> Assertion getInstruction() && "Not a call or invoke instruction!" failed.
With this patch LLVM produces a more sensible error message:
> Cannot select: ... i32 = ExternalSymbol'__foobar'
David Blaikie [Fri, 14 Dec 2018 22:44:46 +0000 (22:44 +0000)]
DebugInfo: Avoid using split DWARF when the split unit would be empty.
In ThinLTO many split CUs may be effectively empty because of the lack
of support for cross-unit references in split DWARF.
Using a split unit in those cases is just a waste/overhead - and turned
out to be one contributor to a significant symbolizer performance issue
when global variable debug info was being imported (see r348416 for the
primary fix) due to symbolizers seeing CUs with no ranges, assuming
there might still be addresses covered and walking into the split CU to
see if there are any ranges (when that split CU was in a DWP file, that
meant loading the DWP and its index, the index was extra large because
of all these fractured/empty CUs... and so was very expensive to load).
(the 3rd fix which will follow, is to assume that a CU with no ranges is
empty rather than merely missing its CU level range data - and to not
walk into its DIEs (split or otherwise) in search of address information
that is generally not present)
projects / llvm / log