From: William A. Rowe Jr <wrowe@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:47:55 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Idea to help https://people.apache.org/~kbrand/mod_ssl-2.4.x-ekh.diff w/review
X-Git-Tag: 2.4.7~54
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fe69ed735b6548aef302a11d7cb0fbb383f28dea;p=apache

Idea to help https://people.apache.org/~kbrand/mod_ssl-2.4.x-ekh.diff w/review

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x@1541228 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 783777e82e..530b4d3fc7 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -175,7 +175,10 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
                    https://svn.apache.org/r1527295
                    https://svn.apache.org/r1527926
     2.4.x patch: https://people.apache.org/~kbrand/mod_ssl-2.4.x-ekh.diff
-    +1: kbrand,
+    +1: kbrand
+    [wrowe comments] is it possible to split the patch into 'accepted for 2.2'
+    which is straightforward to review (and commit seperately) from those
+    features 'new to 2.4'?  I think that would attract the necessary eyeballs.
 
   * mod_auth_form: Make sure the optional functions are loaded even when
     the AuthFormProvider isn't specified.