From: Steve Naroff Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:17:43 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Abolish a bunch of Xcode inserted tabs. X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f69cc5d6606fc65a76e3acd6eb6e13efd0098295;p=clang Abolish a bunch of Xcode inserted tabs. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@46566 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/AST/ASTContext.cpp b/AST/ASTContext.cpp index 8d620d9d62..96bf45db7b 100644 --- a/AST/ASTContext.cpp +++ b/AST/ASTContext.cpp @@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@ void ASTContext::getObjCEncodingForType(QualType T, std::string& S, } else if (T->isEnumeralType()) { S += 'i'; } else - assert(0 && "@encode for type not implemented!"); + assert(0 && "@encode for type not implemented!"); } void ASTContext::getObjCEncodingForTypeQualifier(Decl::ObjCDeclQualifier QT, @@ -1579,10 +1579,10 @@ bool ASTContext::functionTypesAreCompatible(QualType lhs, QualType rhs) { // The use of ellipsis agree...now check the argument types. for (unsigned i = 0; i < lproto_nargs; i++) - // C99 6.7.5.3p15: ...and each parameter declared with qualified type - // is taken as having the unqualified version of it's declared type. + // C99 6.7.5.3p15: ...and each parameter declared with qualified type + // is taken as having the unqualified version of it's declared type. if (!typesAreCompatible(lproto->getArgType(i).getUnqualifiedType(), - rproto->getArgType(i).getUnqualifiedType())) + rproto->getArgType(i).getUnqualifiedType())) return false; return true; } @@ -1651,7 +1651,7 @@ bool ASTContext::typesAreCompatible(QualType lhs, QualType rhs) { // is an interface, we defer to objcTypesAreCompatible(). if (lcanon->isObjCInterfaceType() || rcanon->isObjCInterfaceType()) return objcTypesAreCompatible(lcanon, rcanon); - + // C99 6.7.2.2p4: Each enumerated type shall be compatible with char, // a signed integer type, or an unsigned integer type. // FIXME: need to check the size and ensure it's the same. diff --git a/Driver/RewriteTest.cpp b/Driver/RewriteTest.cpp index aac572177a..4c84b8adcb 100644 --- a/Driver/RewriteTest.cpp +++ b/Driver/RewriteTest.cpp @@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ namespace { class RewriteTest : public ASTConsumer { Rewriter Rewrite; Diagnostic &Diags; - unsigned RewriteFailedDiag; - + unsigned RewriteFailedDiag; + ASTContext *Context; SourceManager *SM; unsigned MainFileID; @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ namespace { CurMethodDecl = 0; SuperStructDecl = 0; BcLabelCount = 0; - + // Get the ID and start/end of the main file. MainFileID = SM->getMainFileID(); const llvm::MemoryBuffer *MainBuf = SM->getBuffer(MainFileID); @@ -165,10 +165,10 @@ namespace { virtual void HandleTopLevelDecl(Decl *D); void HandleDeclInMainFile(Decl *D); RewriteTest(bool isHeader, Diagnostic &D) : Diags(D) { - IsHeader = isHeader; + IsHeader = isHeader; RewriteFailedDiag = Diags.getCustomDiagID(Diagnostic::Warning, "rewriting sub-expression within a macro (may not be correct)"); - } + } ~RewriteTest(); // Syntactic Rewriting. @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ void RewriteTest::HandleDeclInMainFile(Decl *D) { if (FunctionDecl *FD = dyn_cast(D)) if (Stmt *Body = FD->getBody()) FD->setBody(RewriteFunctionBodyOrGlobalInitializer(Body)); - + if (ObjCMethodDecl *MD = dyn_cast(D)) { if (Stmt *Body = MD->getBody()) { //Body->dump(); @@ -464,10 +464,10 @@ void RewriteTest::RewriteMethodDeclaration(ObjCMethodDecl *Method) { SourceLocation LocEnd = Method->getLocEnd(); if (SM->getLineNumber(LocEnd) > SM->getLineNumber(LocStart)) { - Rewrite.InsertText(LocStart, "/* ", 3); - Rewrite.ReplaceText(LocEnd, 1, ";*/ ", 4); + Rewrite.InsertText(LocStart, "/* ", 3); + Rewrite.ReplaceText(LocEnd, 1, ";*/ ", 4); } else { - Rewrite.InsertText(LocStart, "// ", 3); + Rewrite.InsertText(LocStart, "// ", 3); } } @@ -710,9 +710,9 @@ Stmt *RewriteTest::RewriteObjCIvarRefExpr(ObjCIvarRefExpr *IV) { if (Rewrite.ReplaceStmt(IV, Replacement)) { // replacement failed. SourceRange Range = IV->getSourceRange(); - if (!SilenceRewriteMacroWarning) + if (!SilenceRewriteMacroWarning) Diags.Report(Context->getFullLoc(IV->getLocation()), RewriteFailedDiag, - 0, 0, &Range, 1); + 0, 0, &Range, 1); } delete IV; return Replacement; @@ -736,9 +736,9 @@ Stmt *RewriteTest::RewriteObjCIvarRefExpr(ObjCIvarRefExpr *IV) { if (Rewrite.ReplaceStmt(IV->getBase(), PE)) { // replacement failed. SourceRange Range = IV->getBase()->getSourceRange(); - if (!SilenceRewriteMacroWarning) + if (!SilenceRewriteMacroWarning) Diags.Report(Context->getFullLoc(IV->getBase()->getLocStart()), - RewriteFailedDiag, 0, 0, &Range, 1); + RewriteFailedDiag, 0, 0, &Range, 1); } delete IV->getBase(); return PE; @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ Stmt *RewriteTest::RewriteFunctionBodyOrGlobalInitializer(Stmt *S) { if (ObjCSelectorExpr *AtSelector = dyn_cast(S)) return RewriteAtSelector(AtSelector); - + if (ObjCStringLiteral *AtString = dyn_cast(S)) return RewriteObjCStringLiteral(AtString); @@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ Stmt *RewriteTest::RewriteAtEncode(ObjCEncodeExpr *Exp) { SourceRange Range = Exp->getSourceRange(); if (!SilenceRewriteMacroWarning) Diags.Report(Context->getFullLoc(Exp->getAtLoc()), RewriteFailedDiag, - 0, 0, &Range, 1); + 0, 0, &Range, 1); } // Replace this subexpr in the parent. @@ -1329,7 +1329,7 @@ Stmt *RewriteTest::RewriteAtSelector(ObjCSelectorExpr *Exp) { SourceRange Range = Exp->getSourceRange(); if (!SilenceRewriteMacroWarning) Diags.Report(Context->getFullLoc(Exp->getAtLoc()), RewriteFailedDiag, - 0, 0, &Range, 1); + 0, 0, &Range, 1); } delete Exp; return SelExp; @@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ Stmt *RewriteTest::RewriteObjCStringLiteral(ObjCStringLiteral *Exp) { SourceRange Range = Exp->getSourceRange(); if (!SilenceRewriteMacroWarning) Diags.Report(Context->getFullLoc(Exp->getAtLoc()), RewriteFailedDiag, - 0, 0, &Range, 1); + 0, 0, &Range, 1); } delete Exp; return cast; @@ -2041,7 +2041,7 @@ Stmt *RewriteTest::RewriteMessageExpr(ObjCMessageExpr *Exp) { SourceRange Range = Exp->getSourceRange(); if (!SilenceRewriteMacroWarning) Diags.Report(Context->getFullLoc(Exp->getLocStart()), RewriteFailedDiag, - 0, 0, &Range, 1); + 0, 0, &Range, 1); } delete Exp; @@ -2068,7 +2068,7 @@ Stmt *RewriteTest::RewriteObjCProtocolExpr(ObjCProtocolExpr *Exp) { SourceRange Range = Exp->getSourceRange(); if (!SilenceRewriteMacroWarning) Diags.Report(Context->getFullLoc(Exp->getAtLoc()), RewriteFailedDiag, - 0, 0, &Range, 1); + 0, 0, &Range, 1); } delete Exp; return ProtoExp; @@ -2116,11 +2116,11 @@ void RewriteTest::SynthesizeObjCInternalStruct(ObjCInterfaceDecl *CDecl, if (RCDecl && ObjCSynthesizedStructs.count(RCDecl)) { Result = "\n struct "; Result += RCDecl->getName(); - // Note: We don't name the field decl. This simplifies the "codegen" for - // accessing a superclasses instance variables (and is similar to what gcc - // does internally). The unnamed struct field feature is enabled with - // -fms-extensions. If the struct definition were "inlined", we wouldn't - // need to use this switch. That said, I don't want to inline the def. + // Note: We don't name the field decl. This simplifies the "codegen" for + // accessing a superclasses instance variables (and is similar to what gcc + // does internally). The unnamed struct field feature is enabled with + // -fms-extensions. If the struct definition were "inlined", we wouldn't + // need to use this switch. That said, I don't want to inline the def. Result += ";\n"; // insert the super class structure definition. @@ -2163,11 +2163,11 @@ void RewriteTest::SynthesizeObjCInternalStruct(ObjCInterfaceDecl *CDecl, endBuf += Lexer::MeasureTokenLength(LocEnd, *SM); Result += " {\n struct "; Result += RCDecl->getName(); - // Note: We don't name the field decl. This simplifies the "codegen" for - // accessing a superclasses instance variables (and is similar to what gcc - // does internally). The unnamed struct field feature is enabled with - // -fms-extensions. If the struct definition were "inlined", we wouldn't - // need to use this switch. That said, I don't want to inline the def. + // Note: We don't name the field decl. This simplifies the "codegen" for + // accessing a superclasses instance variables (and is similar to what gcc + // does internally). The unnamed struct field feature is enabled with + // -fms-extensions. If the struct definition were "inlined", we wouldn't + // need to use this switch. That said, I don't want to inline the def. Result += ";\n};\n"; Rewrite.ReplaceText(LocStart, endBuf-startBuf, Result.c_str(), Result.size());