From: Ted Kremenek Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:20:26 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Fixed bug in CFG construction where we did not properly handle the GCC X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ecc04c925412f935a936226452407bf8a51ed027;p=clang Fixed bug in CFG construction where we did not properly handle the GCC extension "?:" for the ternary operator, e.g.: x ?: y; This expression is represented in the clang ASTs as a ConditionalOperator whose LHS expression is NULL. Now we handle this special case, causing the block containing the condition to be a predecessor to the block that "merges" the values of the ternary operator. Thanks to Nuno Lopes for identifying and diagnosing this bug! git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@44327 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/AST/CFG.cpp b/AST/CFG.cpp index f99de1cc79..0c8589b058 100644 --- a/AST/CFG.cpp +++ b/AST/CFG.cpp @@ -220,24 +220,53 @@ CFGBlock* CFGBuilder::WalkAST(Stmt* S, bool AlwaysAddStmt = false) { switch (S->getStmtClass()) { case Stmt::ConditionalOperatorClass: { ConditionalOperator* C = cast(S); - + + // Create the confluence block that will "merge" the results + // of the ternary expression. CFGBlock* ConfluenceBlock = (Block) ? Block : createBlock(); ConfluenceBlock->appendStmt(C); FinishBlock(ConfluenceBlock); + + // Create a block for the LHS expression if there is an LHS expression. + // A GCC extension allows LHS to be NULL, causing the condition to + // be the value that is returned instead. + // e.g: x ?: y is shorthand for: x ? x : y; Succ = ConfluenceBlock; Block = NULL; - CFGBlock* LHSBlock = Visit(C->getLHS()); - FinishBlock(LHSBlock); + CFGBlock* LHSBlock = NULL; + if (C->getLHS()) { + LHSBlock = Visit(C->getLHS()); + FinishBlock(LHSBlock); + Block = NULL; + } + // Create the block for the RHS expression. Succ = ConfluenceBlock; - Block = NULL; CFGBlock* RHSBlock = Visit(C->getRHS()); FinishBlock(RHSBlock); + // Create the block that will contain the condition. Block = createBlock(false); - Block->addSuccessor(LHSBlock); + + if (LHSBlock) + Block->addSuccessor(LHSBlock); + else { + // If we have no LHS expression, add the ConfluenceBlock as a direct + // successor for the block containing the condition. Moreover, + // we need to reverse the order of the predecessors in the + // ConfluenceBlock because the RHSBlock will have been added to + // the succcessors already, and we want the first predecessor to the + // the block containing the expression for the case when the ternary + // expression evaluates to true. + Block->addSuccessor(ConfluenceBlock); + assert (ConfluenceBlock->pred_size() == 2); + std::reverse(ConfluenceBlock->pred_begin(), + ConfluenceBlock->pred_end()); + } + Block->addSuccessor(RHSBlock); + Block->setTerminator(C); return addStmt(C->getCond()); }