From: Reid Kleckner <rnk@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:16:28 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Exclude PCH/missing-file.cpp on Windows, it does not pass reliably
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e81797369bdd8d789df7e3b44514f692451a853d;p=clang

Exclude PCH/missing-file.cpp on Windows, it does not pass reliably

Tag the test with "REQUIRES: can-remove-opened-file", which is what we
use for the similar test Modules/explicit-build-missing-file.cpp.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@260994 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/test/PCH/missing-file.cpp b/test/PCH/missing-file.cpp
index 502a9db657..8bdb08d637 100644
--- a/test/PCH/missing-file.cpp
+++ b/test/PCH/missing-file.cpp
@@ -4,16 +4,15 @@
 // RUN: echo 'struct S{char c; int i; }; void foo() {}' > %t.h
 // RUN: echo 'template <typename T> void tf() { T::foo(); }' >> %t.h
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -emit-pch -o %t.h.pch %t.h
-
-// %t.h might be touched by scanners as a hot file on Windows,
-// to fail to remove %.h with single run.
-// FIXME: Do we really want to work around bugs in virus checkers here?
-// RUN: rm %t.h || rm %t.h || rm %t.h
+// RUN: rm %t.h
 
 // Check diagnostic with location in original source:
 // RUN: not %clang_cc1 -include-pch %t.h.pch -emit-obj -o %t.o %s 2> %t.stderr
 // RUN: grep 'could not find file' %t.stderr
 
+// Oftentimes on Windows there are open handles, and deletion will fail.
+// REQUIRES: can-remove-opened-file
+
 void qq(S*) {}
 
 #ifdef REDECL