From: Ian Holsman Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:09:34 +0000 (+0000) Subject: A vetoing I will go... A vetoing I will go.. X-Git-Tag: 2.0.40~146 X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e68f4953d2a3844924deb2e152ebf3f325c569bf;p=apache A vetoing I will go... A vetoing I will go.. hi ho the merrio .. a vetoing I will go. ;-0 git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@96164 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index a0f3235986..84c6c7fe3d 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/07/23 18:04:23 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/07/24 00:09:34 $] Release: @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ CURRENT VOTES: a) httpd-std.conf should be tailored by install (from src or binbuild) even if user has existing httpd.conf - +1: trawick, slive, gregames + +1: trawick, slive, gregames, ianh b) tailored httpd-std.conf should be copied by install to sysconfdir/examples @@ -78,13 +78,18 @@ CURRENT VOTES: d) Installing a set of default config files when upgrading a server doesn't make ANY sense at all. - +1: rbb + +1: rbb, + ianh - medium/big sites don't use 'standard config' anyway, as it + usually needs major customizations * apachectl should revert to just being an init script and httpd.sh should be the wrapper for httpd which sources envvars and allows any options to be passed through - +1: trawick, gregames + +1: trawick, gregames + -0.5: ianh - a wrapper which calls another wrapper which then sources + envvars ?? i'm not sure why calling apachectl -V is a bad + thing. * Should we always build [support*] binaries statically unless otherwise indicated?